Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

March 2022

City Council will hold a special meeting regarding site plan updates HEB | Business

By Site plan

FORNEY, Texas— Forney City Council will hold a special meeting on Thursday evening to hear public input before going into executive session to discuss the proposed HEB store which was announced late last year and recently approved.

Scheduled for Thursday at 6:30 p.m. at Forney Town Hall, the council will take up to 30 minutes for public comment before reconvening in executive session.

The majority of comments and discussion will focus on a current proposal put forward by Union Pacific Railroad that would close three crossings – two in downtown Forney and a third on County Road (CR) 212 – and create a new crossing on the HEB property website. .

“At a special meeting on March 22, the council discussed a new level crossing for the HEB site plan. In order to open a new level crossing, Union Pacific requires that three existing level crossings be closed At this meeting Forney City Council authorized the City Manager to write a letter in support of the closure of the Elm St. and Center St. crossings These crossings were proposed as they are the least frequented crossings with only an average of 1,000 vehicles per day. . on average about 10,000 vehicle crossings per day,” the town of Forney posted on its Facebook page on March 24, 2022.

The proposed site plan is available here on the city website.

“The purpose of the meeting was to speak with representatives from HEB and also consult with our city’s legal counsel regarding this important decision. The meeting was not ‘last minute’, ‘under the radar’ or in no ‘secret’ way,” said, in part, Forney Councilman Sarah Salgado of the March 22 meeting. “The City issued the agenda and public notice last Friday, March 18, and everyone was welcome to attend the open session portion of the meeting.”

“While there are of course always different opinions, the overwhelming majority of residents I have spoken with are thrilled with HEB coming to town. That is how I feel too. This development will be a huge benefit to economic growth, the tax base, and HEB is known to be an amazing community partner, which includes working with nonprofits, school districts, and many other community partners. high quality online with the kind of community we want Forney to be,” Salgado said.

As HEB’s first store east of the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex – a market they’ve largely avoided before – HEB is a huge win for any city in Texas. According to a local chamber of commerce official, towns in Texas are “aiming” for an HEB.

Forney’s expansive growth and traffic is what attracted HEB to Forney and the surrounding area. However, this growth has not been met by my infrastructure improvements from the federal level for years.

Congressman Lance Gooden of Terrell said he was working with Union Pacific officials in Washington, confirming to inForney.com that he met with them on Wednesday about how they can help ease traffic jams.

Gooden tells inForney.com that working with Forney Mayor Amanda Lewis, he feels positive about conversations with Union Pacific to find something acceptable and they are actively working to minimize closures.

“This is my main local priority and Mayor Lewis and I are acutely aware of the seriousness of the already difficult traffic situations. We will work to remedy this and Mayor Lewis and I will not agree to anything that our constituents find unacceptable or unreasonable. “, says Gooden inForney.com

“The closure of the three crossings is only proposed and has not been approved by Union Pacific. If approved, it will not be closed until after the completion of HEB, which is more than 18 months away. “Salgado said.

“Closing Elm and the Center will not hinder or help our response times for police or firefighters,” Salgado’s comments continued. “If there is a train on the tracks in Bois D’Arc, that means there is also a train in Elm, Center and Chestnut. The problem of getting our police and fire department across the tracks to respond appeals is being resolved by council – such as with our recent vote to approve a temporary fire station on the south side.”

“This is not a permanent or permanent solution, but it is a step in the process of building a permanent station. Other measures to alleviate the traffic build-up at the Bois D’Arc intersection have discussed on Tuesday night,” she said. “We are aware that more needs to be done, and plans and ideas are being discussed.”

Amazon sitemap for Cleckheaton could face union boycott

By Site plan

A union has said it will call for a boycott of plans for a massive Amazon facility at Scholes near Cleckheaton if the company makes it difficult for workers to organise.

This follows concerns about the number of jobs advertised on Amazon’s site and doubts about whether they materialized. Opponents of the program have expressed concern that the majority of jobs created will be low-skilled or unskilled.

Now the GMB union, which campaigns for better working conditions for Amazon workers, says its “main objective” will be to secure recognition and settlement agreements with Amazon and ensure that the company adheres to the new West Yorkshire Fair Work Charter. GMB’s lead organizer for Amazon in Yorkshire, Pete Davies, said the union will ask Kirklees Council to put as much pressure as possible on Amazon to ensure GMB has access to recruitment for all workers it company employs “if this planned new investment materializes”.

Read more:Exact time it will snow in Huddersfield, York, Bradford, Sheffield and Leeds today

Last year Kirklees Council planning officers said it was ‘acceptable in principle’ because of the 1,500 jobs it would create. That number has since risen to 2,400.

The plans are expected to come back to the committee over the summer. Mr Davies said: “If Amazon just remains silent on these issues, we will view this as another attempt to circumvent GMB.

“In this case, we will discourage the board from granting permission and support accordingly.” The huge base, recently revealed to be a distribution centre, is set to occupy 59 acres of farmland between Whitehall Road, Whitechapel Road and Junction 26 of the M62.

It has been described by critics as “absolutely monstrous” and equivalent in height to an eight-story tower and the length of three full-size football pitches side by side. Since coming to the planning committee last May, the proposal has been compared to other Amazon sites where green fields have been bulldozed, but final drafts have failed to come up with numbers. employment.

Among those who spoke was Batley and Spen MP Kim Leadbeater. Ahead of her election last year, she called Amazon’s plan “totally inappropriate” and said much-valued green spaces should not be “traded off” for jobs.

That sentiment was partly echoed by Mr Davies, who commented: “We understand and sympathize with those who don’t want to see these huge warehouses popping up in their areas. We agree that we should not encourage multinationals to simply invest in West Yorkshire. for the unemployment figures and at all costs.

“But we are a union and our first priority must be to campaign for better opportunities for workers and better employment rights.” Action group Save Our Spen said a new report to the council setting out socio-economic benefits ‘paints a totally different picture of reality’ by outlining projections of up to 2,400 jobs.

A spokesperson said the group was “not against job creation”, but added: “There is already a surplus of low-skilled distribution vacancies in the region. All that development Amazon warehouses will make the situation worse.”

Milton Board Confirms Preliminary Approval of Verizon Sitemap

By Site plan

Milton City Council has unanimously upheld the planning and zoning commission’s decision to grant preliminary site plan approval to Verizon to erect a 140-foot cell tower on land owned by the town on Front Street.

At its March 23 meeting, the board agreed that the planners conducted a thorough, orderly, and logical review of Verizon’s application and made their decision based on the evidence presented. Councilwoman Lee Revis-Plank said the commission attached 17 conditions to their approval that must be met before Verizon can begin moving toward final review of the site plan.

“It’s not something where one or two of them can be checked off. I think the planning and zoning commission took the time to review all the evidence and document for the written record anything that was of concern to them and needed to be addressed. This indicates that the process itself was quite comprehensive,” she said.

Councilman Larry Savage said when Verizon sought a special use permit — required because the tower is in a residential zoning district — the commission imposed nine conditions on approval. During the preliminary sitemap process, the commission added eight more, Savage said, indicating a thorough process.

Council had met on March 23 to decide on an appeal of preliminary site plan approval filed by Milton resident Allen Benson.

In a public hearing on March 9, Benson presented two arguments in favor of overturning the commission’s decision. First, the planning and zoning did not take into account the negative impacts on neighboring properties when granting approval. Second, the city code states that no new utilities can be built in a flood zone, which is this part of Front Street.

The Verizon Tower has been a source of controversy from the start, primarily due to its location, which is believed to be in the city’s current public works yard at 210 Front St. The location backs onto residential homes on Walnut Streets and Collins.

Verizon said the tower’s location and height will provide the best cellphone coverage for Verizon customers in Milton. Opponents, however, say the tower would be an eyesore in a part of town that is frequently flooded and is being proposed as a potential gateway to the town in Milton’s overall development plan, particularly after demolition and construction. removal of the current sewage treatment plant when the new Artesian plant on Route 30 is operational.

At the March 9 hearing, city attorney Seth Thompson, representing planning and zoning, said the commission considered the health, safety and welfare of the community in making its decision. decision. He said the series of conditions placed on the approval were intended to address the flooding issue and that Verizon indicated that the platform where the tower would be placed is above the floodplain. Thompson said the commission questioned Verizon representative John Tracey at length about the flooding issue around Front Street, demonstrating that those concerns were addressed before the commission granted preliminary site plan approval. Finally, he said Verizon still needs approval from state agencies before final approval of the site plan.

Benson’s appeal was only heard by four of the seven council members. Councilor Randi Merdith and Councilors John Collier and Sam Garde have opted out of the proceedings. Supporters of Benson’s appeal also wanted Mayor Ted Kanakos to recuse himself due to a land lease he signed with Verizon in 2019. Kanakos chose not to recuse himself, leaving Kanakos, Savage, Revis- Plank and Councilman Rich Baty as judges on the appeal.

Revis-Plank addressed the audience: “The process this board follows to deal with the appeal is narrowly focused on whether the decision is based on the evidence. It is very difficult and difficult to make this decision. We heard your concerns – I see nods – but, honestly, we heard you. We are your neighbors and we are trying to do our best to make this decision.

After the vote, Benson said: ‘It was apparent to me that, contrary to the comments of two of the board members, they did not listen to my appeal statement or my closing statement at the appeal hearing. The point that seems to have been overlooked is that I never denied that Planning and Zoning discussed flood risk at the site plan hearing, but the point of the appeal was that, contrary to city code, they never discussed the impact a possible increase in flooding on Front Street would have on the adjacent neighborhood.

He said that while he doesn’t have the resources to appeal the council’s decision to the Delaware Superior Court, supporters have been discussing possible funding because the issue is of such concern to the community, which unfolded in large numbers at the March 9 and March 23 meetings on Benson’s Call.

Snoqualmie Valley Community Invited to Public Hearing for Proposed Plant Site Plan Application

By Site plan

The community of Snoqualmie Valley is invited to a public hearing on the proposed Business/Industrial Plan (BIP) Application for the Snoqualmie Mill Site on Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. via Zoom.

The public hearing will be held before a Hearing Examiner, who will allow participants a maximum of 5 minutes for oral testimony.

At the discretion of the Hearing Reviewer, the public comment time may be reduced to less than 5 minutes per participant.

Those wishing to provide written public comments may email Gwyn Berry ([email protected]) for transmission to the Hearing Reviewer.

Written comments must be received no later than March 30, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. Please note the subject line of the email: “Planned commercial/industrial plan (PCI) for the Snoqualmie plant site. »

Details of the Zoom Meeting of the Public Hearing on the Plant Site Plan Application:

ON

Plaintiff (Snoqualmie Mill Ventures, LLC [SMV]) asks the City to approve a Planned Commercial/Industrial Plan (PCI), which proposes the development of the 261-acre Snoqualmie Mill site in three main planning phases/areas over a period of approximately 10-15 years .

Construction would include a total of approximately 1.83 million gross square feet of light industrial/manufacturing, warehouse, office, retail/restaurant and residential uses.

The proposed PCI plan includes requests for several deviations from zoning code development standards.

The Applicant will enter into a Development Agreement with the City for the Project to guide further planning and development of the entire site in accordance with the Snoqualmie Mill PCI Plan.

[Information provided by the City of Snoqualmie]

Snoqualmie will hold a public hearing on the development of the plant site

By Site development

Snoqualmie will hold a public hearing on the development of the plant site

The Town of Snoqualmie will hold a public hearing into the Commercial/Industrial Plan of the Snoqualmie Plant Site before a Hearing Examiner at 4:00 p.m. on March 30.

The meeting will take place via Zoom. Residents interested in participating may submit oral or written testimony to the Hearing Examiner, who, along with a report and recommendation, will be submitted to City Council for consideration.

Using this report, the city council will then make a final decision on whether to approve or reject the PCI plan at a later date. If the PCI plan is approved, it would give the green light for construction on the property, assuming no additional building permits are required.

The PCI plan was submitted to the city in 2017 by Snoqualmie Mill Ventures LLC. The plan proposes to develop the 261-acre Mill Site property north of downtown in three phases over a 10 to 15-year period. This development would include 1.83 gross square feet of commercial, office, light industrial and residential space.

Several areas of the proposed development are heavily polluted due to its more than 100 year history as a sawmill. However, there is no known pollution in the first phase of the proposed development.

This first phase would include 604,000 square feet of development, as well as 160 residential units in mixed-use buildings.

A draft environmental impact statement for the project completed by the city in April 2020 received over 900 pages of public comment. A final impact statement was released last December.

A link to the hearing and more information can be found here: bit.ly/3wuJbnJ.

Trustees greenlight final site plan for Brown Mortgage Group

By Site plan


A rendering of the proposed office building to be built next to Edley’s Bar-B-Que on Route 157 this year.

Town of Glen Carbon

Chris Brown, owner of Brown Mortgage Group, received unanimous approval from village administrators on Tuesday for the final site plan for his company’s new building, which will be built in the Sunset Park Plaza development in Glen Carbon, next to ‘Edley’s Bar-B-Que.

The plan calls for a 9,670 sq. of Public Works, Scott Slemer. It also complies with the village code.

Plocher Construction is the general contractor for the project. Thouvenot, Wade and Moerchen, Inc. is the engineering company for the project.


RELATED: Brown Mortgage Group Could Build Next to Edley’s BBQ

The business will employ approximately 10 people on a shift with approximate hours of operation from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. The site will have 51 regular parking spaces with two bicycle parking spaces and two that meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The parking lot will have two entrances, one shared with Edley’s and the other in a cul-de-sac.

The former site of the Clark gas station could accommodate food trucks | Ozaukee County Business News

By Site plan

GRAFTON – The village of Grafton is set to repurpose the former Clark Station site, clearing it so it can be made available as a food truck site.

The finance committee on Monday discussed a plan to convert the 1020 Washington Street site to Grafton Station, a village-run property that could accommodate food trucks. According to information from village staff, they were contacted by a food truck salesman to use the site for his business.

The site has been vacant for several years since the closure of Clark Station and had to undergo the removal of underground gas tanks left after the property was abandoned.

“Unfortunately the site is in poor condition since the removal of the underground storage tanks also removed some of the concrete,” Grafton village administrator Jesse Thyes wrote in a briefing to the committee of councils. finance.


Stay up to date on all the latest Washington County news with a print subscription to the Daily News: https://bit.ly/dailynews_sub


“Staff worked with Ozaukee County on a preliminary cost estimate of $8,840 for the paving,” he added.

The site, once redeveloped, could accommodate one or two food trucks at a time.

The Finance Committee sent the item to the Village Council with a positive recommendation that the Village use up to $10,000 from the Village Revolving Credit Fund to cover site improvements.

There is currently up to $35,000 available in the revolving loan fund for economic development projects, beyond the $450,000 the village is holding back for future loans, according to village information. The village council will need to approve the use of the funds at its next meeting before the funding is finalized.

“The village will prepare the site and work with Ozaukee County on paving,” Thyes said. “There are several other steps to realizing the vision of a food truck site, including but not limited to establishing a ‘rental’ permit for use of the site, as well as other logistical details.”

A layout plan for Grafton station was also approved by the Planning Commission this week at its meeting on Tuesday.

“The original plan for the Clark site at 1020 Washington Street was to work with the owner to the north – the Patel family – to combine the two properties for a mixed-use redevelopment project. Unfortunately the Patels have indicated to the staff that they are unable to move forward in the near future, (so) the staff are developing the food truck idea to create a managed food truck site by the village”, Jessica, director of community development for the village. Wolff said in a memo to the commission.

Wolff said the Grafton Station site would be an interim use. Once the owners to the north are ready to plan a redevelopment of the two properties together, the village is still planning that.

In the meantime, the creation of the temporary location for the food trucks will give the property a potential function and allow it to be finished and maintained.

Right now the use is really just to clear the site,” said village chairman and planning commissioner Jim Brunnquell. “It’s a potential use. We had some interest.

Site plan for a new craft beverage plant approved in Berryville | Winchester Star

By Site plan

BERRYVILLE — A businessman’s project to make hard cider on a former industrial site is moving forward.

The Berryville Planning Commission on Monday approved a site plan for the former Smalley Packaging Co. property at 324 First St., where Jim Madaj aims to establish a craft beverage manufacturing plant.

Madaj owns Wild Hare Cidery, which already has operations elsewhere in Northern Virginia. He intends to manufacture the company’s alcoholic beverage products at the Berryville location, as well as have retail sales and a tasting room for customers there.

At a public hearing, Christina Kraybill, who lives nearby, expressed concern that the installation could increase traffic along First Street. She said she had visited other tasting rooms where full portions were served rather than samples.

Today, a tasting room is “more like a pub,” Kraybill said.

“I don’t think it will be another Bear Chase situation,” said fellow neighbor Katie Rosenbrook. She was referring to a brewery in Bluemont that Clarke County officials say is largely responsible for the traffic problems at the Va intersection. 7 (Harry Byrd Highway) and Route 601 (Blue Ridge Mountain Road).

Yet another neighbor, Natalie Fiorica, said “young people in Berryville need to have a safe place to go” to grab a drink without traveling far.

The site plan was approved with three conditions:

All building code requirements must be met and Clarke County must issue a certificate of occupancy prior to plant opening.

Planned changes to parking areas and site exit must be completed prior to opening, and

An amendment to the plan must be approved by the commission before operations can be extended in the future. A special use permit may be required for certain types of expanded operations, said Berryville Community Development Manager Christy Dunkle.

The First Street building has approximately 14,000 square feet of floor space. About 1,600 square feet are to be used for tasting and sales, documents show.

Madaj recently told the commission that he plans to use only about 20% of the space initially, and eventually hopes to do bottling and canning for other craft beverage makers. on the spot.

He estimates that three or four employees will work there immediately, and more will be added to the payroll as activity increases.

Scheduled opening hours for tasting and retail will be 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Friday, noon to 8 p.m. Saturday, and noon to 6 p.m. Sunday, depending on plans.

No outside storage will be permitted on the property, which according to county tax records is owned by Valley Venture Fund I, LLC. The appraised value of the property is listed at $660,000.

The community must be included in the development of the Northern Metal site

By Site development



For generations, the Mississippi River in north Minneapolis has been treated like a brownfield, home to some of the dirtiest businesses that have harmed families living nearby. An example is Northern Metal Recycling’s shredding plant.

The metal shredder started in 2009, and residents of north and northeast Minneapolis paid the price. For 12 years, people close to Northern Metal have breathed in pollution, including lead dust in the air, which has poisoned people and our children. This, in addition to other sources of pollution, has resulted in some of the largest health disparities in the state for this region.

When Northern Metal refused to shut down their grinder in 2019 as they had promised, it took organizing, taking legal action and a whistleblower presented evidence that the operation was providing false readings on their monitoring equipment. pollution to end this nightmare.

The decade-long struggle against Northern Metal ended with the victory of community members, mothers and youth in North Minneapolis and Northern Metal finally moved on.

The pollution is gone, but the work is not done

With news that the Minneapolis Park Board is considering a proposal to acquire and redevelop the Northern Metal site, it’s time to think about the decades ahead. We need to celebrate this win, learn from what happened, and make sure the community gets a leading voice in determining the future of this site.

I’ve been involved in this fight with many others since the beginning, and it’s part of the reason why I helped found Community Members for Environmental Justice (CMEJ). The CMEJ is a vehicle for our community to stand up against pollution on the Northside and in solidarity with other neighborhoods, raise awareness in our community, advocate with our elected officials and, if necessary, intervene in court.

Community members demonstrate outside the Northern Metal Recycling facility in May 2021. Credit: Jaida Gray Eagle | Sahan Diary

Since 2013, community members have been coming forward and asking our elected officials to do something about Northern Metal’s fires, lies and pollution. In 2016, we learned that airborne lead and other toxic compounds released from their facility along the Mississippi River were being inhaled by our children.

We know from a whistleblower in 2019 that Northern Metal tried to hide its wrongdoings by manipulating pollution data. We know we cannot trust Northern Metal to operate safely when fires broke out at their facilities in Minneapolis and Becker, Minnesota. Throughout this period, and since the mill ceased operations, community members feared further fires. It is a huge relief to me and my neighbors that we can soon be rid of this environmental hazard to our neighborhood.

Holding Northern Metal accountable has been hard and exhausting work. It shouldn’t have been so painful. It should not have been left to an already overburdened community to do this work. We have been fighting for almost a decade for Northern Metal and members of government to protect people and ensure our children can breathe.

Seeking to end this corporate polluter is a relief, but that doesn’t mean the job is done. What replaces Northern Metal matters a lot. Now is the time to engage people, not push ahead with developer-focused proposals that put profits first.

The point is, if and when Northern Metal leaves, the public will foot the cleanup bill after we’ve already paid the cost with our health.

So if Northern Metal is out, what will happen next? The site has functioned as an industrial site for generations. The point is, if and when Northern Metal leaves, the public will foot the cleanup bill after we’ve already paid the cost with our health. With all this burden we have carried comes the responsibility of our public servants to engage and be accountable to the community.

Obviously, the Northsiders are not starting from a place of trust in our government and in the for-profit developers, all the more reason for it to be done right. And this site has the potential to become a space that reclaims natural abundance and the community’s connection to the river, guided by the vision of those who live here.

We must take this moment to reflect on how we got here, or we risk repeating the same historical mistakes and processes that reflect colonialism and perpetuate environmental racism. It is not enough to simply eliminate the evil, the community deserves reconciliation and reparation.

The creative energy and commitment to our community is what makes this next phase in the story of this patch of land along the river exciting and so important. We celebrate the idea of ​​a future free of Northern Metal and many other polluters, and once again demand that our voices be valued and our bodies respected wherever we go from here.

The Villages files site plan for Spanish Springs Town Square apartments

By Site plan

The Villages has officially filed a site plan with the Town of Lady Lake for apartments at Spanish Springs Town Square.

The Villages’ desire to put age-restricted apartments in empty second-floor commercial space in Spanish Springs has been a contentious issue for more than a year. The Villages sued to bend the Lady Lake Commission to their will, ultimately forcing the commissioners to drop their 33 years Regional Impact Development Contract with the Developer.

The site plan, filed with the city on Tuesday, calls for seven apartments in the Van Patten House, the former home of Katie Belle. Three of the apartments will be one bedroom units and four of the apartments will be two bedroom units. There will be 16 dedicated parking spaces for apartment dwellers and their guests.

Many residents, including Mayor Jim Rietz, who has a large “Save Spanish Springs” sticker on the rear window of his vehicle, remain suspicious of the Villages’ potential long-term program for the original town square. The elimination of Katie Belle, cutting off the extended happy hour previously enjoyed exclusively in Spanish Springs, and the eerie silence over the future of the shuttered Rialto Theater are feared to be part of a secret plan to suck life space. Some have expressed concern that The Villages will end nighttime entertainment in the square.

York County vote on Carolina Panthers site plan at Rock Hill SC

By Site plan

A surprise vote Monday night could get the Carolina Panthers headquarters project in Rock Hill back under construction.

York County Council voted 4-3 for a resolution that would commit the county to take “all necessary steps to execute and deliver” a fee agreement with the team, according to the motion brought forward by Councilman Joel Hamilton. The motion would authorize fees rather than taxes “as we discussed in depth during the executive session,” Hamilton said.

There weren’t many details on the plan since it wasn’t on the county’s agenda Monday. More details on the restructured financial package will come later.

Council members who backed the decision Monday night said it signaled to the Panthers that the county was serious about the project and put people back to work at the site.

Hamilton said he thought the incentive deal discussed during Monday night’s executive session was better than the one previously negotiated. It’s growth that pays for growth, he said, and puts the site’s tax revenue back into it.

“We’re not talking about giving money away,” Hamilton said. “We are talking about an investment in public goods.”

According to the county, this does not involve any government entity borrowing funds. These are special source income credits. With the deal, the county wouldn’t see tax revenue from the site — it would go to public infrastructure there — for 30 years.

“I think it’s very important that we continue to fight on behalf of the Carolina Panthers and one of the biggest booms in economic development, whether it’s five, 10, 15, 20 or 30 years from now,” Councilor Allison Love said.

Council held its typical business meeting and then spent almost three hours in closed executive session. The Board returned and suspended its rules of procedure for voting on the Panthers’ deal.

President Christi Cox, who voted against the resolution with members Tom Audette and Robert Winkler, said the vote was out of order.

“I don’t believe that’s the way the county should do business,” Cox said.

Cox did not vote in favor of the original incentive agreement reached between the county, the team, the town of Rock Hill and the school district that committed future tax revenues to public infrastructure – roads, utilities – related to the project off I-77. Cox said she wanted the project, but feared the new resolution would commit an additional $57 million in incentives to get it. His biggest concern is public transparency.

“I decline to do so when I believe our process has not been followed and it results in additional expense that taxpayers have not had a chance to speak out against,” Cox said.

Winkler, who spearheads many economic development projects in his role on the council, said he owes it to his constituents not to back a plan that has come forward so quickly.

“That resolution was not on the agenda tonight,” Winkler said. “It wasn’t in an email to us. I didn’t see it until the executive session tonight.

Hamilton said he shared his concern and discomfort with how the vote went. Yet he also spoke of a generational project that is likely the biggest any council member will ever see in the area. A project the county stands to lose, he said, without quick action.

“I also have great concern for the hundreds of men and women who have worked tirelessly day in and day out on this site to get this project off the ground and whose jobs are currently under threat and may not return,” Hamilton said.

Earlier this month, Tepper Sports & Entertainment, representing the Charlotte-based NFL team, announced it would put the Rock Hill headquarters site project on hold due to missed payment deadlines. The City of Rock Hill says it did not miss deadlines from a previous incentive agreement. The construction of the first phase was due to be completed next year.

“Given the economic realities, the difficult but prudent decision has been made to put the project on hold,” Tepper Sports said in a statement in early March. “Ongoing work will continue with our partners to find an economically acceptable solution for all parties to continue this project at Rock Hill.”

In early March, Rock Hill officials said in a statement that the city was unaware of a planned pause in construction and intended to continue to honor its agreement with the Panthers.

Early Tuesday, Rock Hill officials said the city had no further comment on the matter.

A spokesperson for Tepper Sports & Entertainment declined to comment.

Councilman William “Bump” Roddey has been asking Rock Hill officials for the past two weeks to contact the county for help. He agrees that the timing of the resolution was not ideal.

“It happened to us very quickly,” Roddey said. “It probably put the staff in one of the most difficult positions.”

Still, he said, the project is too big for the county to miss.

“It’s not the normal course of action,” Roddey said. “But I think the time we find ourselves in, the situation we face, requires us to suspend the rules and do what we must do to assure the taxpayers of York County that we still have their interests at heart. best interests.

“It’s better. It brings us back to a point where we’re going to see revenue on the bottom line much faster.”

This is a developing story. Check back later for more details.

This story was originally published March 22, 2022 10:55 a.m.

Hilton Head Island Packet Related Stories

John Marks graduated from Furman University in 2004 and joined the Herald in 2005. He covers community growth, municipalities, transportation and education primarily in York and Lancaster counties. The Fort Mill native has won dozens of South Carolina Press Association awards and several President McClatchy Awards for news coverage in Fort Mill and Lake Wylie.
Support my work with a digital subscription

New requirements affect the use of Fill in Site Development

By Site development

In an October 2021 guidance document, which included LSRPA participation in the stakeholder process, the NJDEP provided LSRPs and their clients with more options for the sustainable reuse of “alternative backfill” in redevelopment. and the cleanup of brownfields and other remediation sites.

However, there is a significant catch. Current NJDEP policy requires NJDEP’s prior approval for the use of alternate fill above existing site grade. This has the potential to require large amounts of “clean fill” to raise site levels to climate-resilient elevations where alternative fill could otherwise be safely used.

The growing need for backfill has prompted some companies to supply fill that is falsely identified as clean fill. IIn response, the New Jersey Legislature changed the A-901 license requirements for companies providing filler to require more stringent background checks.

The 2019 amendment, called the Dirty Dirt Act, places companies that engage in soil and fill recycling services (including brokerage, transportation and processing) under a similar regulatory regime and expands the definition of a broker.

Implementing regulations have not yet been promulgated. However, some key deadlines have already passed. Companies engaged in soil and fill recycling services were required to file a notice by October 14, 2021 or cease engaging in newly regulated activities by January 13, 2022. Companies that filed a timely notice must submit a complete A-901 application by April 15, 2022. .

With key deadlines already past, all fill producers and users need to pay attention to the source of the fill material and the sometimes competing regulatory initiatives controlling the fill world.

For more business news, visit NYC News Now.

Planning Board Discusses Economic Development Officer, OK Marathon School Major Site Plan for Addition

By Site plan

A proposal to hire an economic development officer, raised by Hopkinton’s 2020 growth review committee, is moving slowly, with planning council chairman Gary Trendel calling for a meeting between some city officials city ​​and the chamber of commerce.

Hiring a director of development would be above the Planning Board level, but Trendel said he wanted to “put him on the radar” and get the conversation going again.

“I want to make it clear that the Economic Development Officer does not report to the Planning Council, but that is something we could potentially support,” Trendel said at the council meeting on Monday evening.

At least two board members expressed some reservations, while member Fran DeYoung, who served on the growth review committee, said the group’s recommendation was born out of an analysis and review of other regional cities employing an economic development officer or group.

“We identified positive non-residential activity — let’s call it commercial — as a result of this,” DeYoung said. “We were in favor of making a recommendation to the Planning Board [of hiring an economic development officer]. It was also examined by the select committee.

DeYoung said one aspect the committee looked at was how to increase revenue from the nonresidential sector in the city. He mentioned the towns of Ashland and Hudson as examples.

“We thought the economic development officer over time was able to increase the non-residential business base in towns that had an individual or a group that was responsible for…trying to develop that business aspect and who managed to do it. ”

Responding to a question from fellow Planning Council member Ron Priefer, DeYoung said the position could be full-time or contract, with obvious differences on funding for each position.

Member Rob Benson called for more comments from people on “all sides” of the issue.

“I know it came out of the growth study committee, but I thought at the time that the select committee hadn’t moved forward because they couldn’t justify the cost of it compared to, say, a new teacher,” Benson said. “We can say we support him, but I don’t see how we can really go beyond saying we support him. Second, as much as anyone in town wants to minimize their own taxes, there are probably plenty of people out there who want Hopkinton to be a dormitory community.

“Having an economic development officer will obviously stimulate businesses that some people don’t want. I feel like it’s a one-sided conversation right now. I wish we had more input from all sides.

Member David Paul counts himself among those who want to maintain Hopkinton as a “quiet, dormitory community”.

“When the [Town Meeting] article came as far as building a car wash or a storage facility, I voted against that,” he noted. “I like the idea of ​​a quiet town.”

Trendel acknowledged that the board would not vote or make a decision on the matter.

“It’s up to the selection committee. It’s also probably a Town Meeting article,” he said. “There are a lot more discussions to be had here. Our goal is not to solve everything here. … The Growth Study Committee was a sub-committee of this council. … There is no perfect solution. But generally the talking side is to start talking about how we’re going to get things done.

“We don’t make decisions,” Trendel added. “We’re just taking the next step to explore that.”

Approval of the major implementation plan for the Marathon school

Continuing a public hearing since its last meeting, the Planning Board unanimously approved a major site plan for a $3.6 million project that will add four classrooms and 6,400 square feet to the school Elementary of Marathon.

There was no in-depth discussion of the project itself, with BETA Group’s Phil Paradis, the city’s consultant, noting that most of his agency’s issues had been resolved. There must be an updated operation and maintenance plan for the school with the addition. Paradis also mentioned the need to ensure the prevention of runoff leaving the stone dust surfacing area.

Finding that the site plans met site plan standards and were sufficient to properly review the proposed project, council voted 9-0 in favour.

“I can not wait to see it [project] progress over the next year and beyond,” Trendel said.

April 25 meeting added

While the council is meeting again on April 4, its next meeting would have conflicted with the annual municipal meeting on May 2. This has been fixed with the addition of a meeting on April 25. After that, other scheduled meetings are May 16 and June 6.

An agenda item for April 4 will be the discussion of increasing the maximum gross floor area of ​​buildings in Industrial District A from 50% to 80%. Council continued a public hearing Monday evening into the matter, which will appear in the town hall.

Final approval of site plan next to M65 making visitors cringe

By Site plan

The approval of the latest piece in a multi-million pound flagship development of an awful site was greeted as a moment of ‘joy’.

And a Tory senior adviser has said fans outside coming to watch Blackburn Rovers at Ewood Park will no longer “squeal” as they pass the abandoned Lower Darwen paper mill site.

The comments came as the Blackburn with Darwen Council planning committee approved the fourth employment unit on Millbank Business Park. This is the final part of the mixed-use regeneration of land between Greenbank Terrace and Milking Lane, formerly occupied by the Lower Darwen Paper Mill, to come before councillors.

More: Poor quality work carried out on Blackburn road leads to rethinking of repairs

Work has already started on the commercial part of the scheme with Cheshire-based Elan Homes securing full planning permission to build 76 properties on the residential element. The Lancashire Enterprise Partnership has awarded a £1.4million grant for the new link road between Milking Lane and Greenbank Terrace, crucial to the project,

The permitted planning application came from Barnfield Blackburn Ltd, the joint venture between Barnfield Developments and Blackburn with Darwen Council set up to develop the site just off Junction 4 of the M65 which had been vacant and an eyesore for several years.



The abandoned site of the Lower Darwen Paper Mill

Blackburn with Darwen Council regeneration boss Cllr Phil Riley said: “It was put together happily. It was a horror for a very, very long time. We have Rossendale and Darwen MP Jake Berry to thank for getting the money for the link road. This good project will transform the neighborhood.

Blackburn South and Lower Darwen Curator Cllr Jacquie Slater said: ‘I used to cringe every time I walked past the site on a key gateway to Blackburn.

“Away fans going to Rovers must also have backed off. It was horrible. Now we and they won’t have to back down.

Committee chairman Cllr Dave Smith said: “This is a good project on a key gateway to the city. This is the final piece of the site’s puzzle.

The business unit unanimously approved at Thursday night’s meeting will be the largest of four on the site, comprising 35,000 square feet of internal floor space.

Sun Property Group secures Chatswood apartment development site, plans two towers

By Site plan

Sun Property Group, the prominent developer on Sydney’s Lower North Shore, is set to undertake one of its densest projects to date.

They have secured a large development site in Chatswood, which will be their first in the suburbs, and are embarking on the creation of two towers, with around 180 apartments, across the block at 1-17 Bowen Street.

Sun Property Group managing director Cameron Johnson says there is a lot of growth potential in the Chatswood area.

“Understandably, as we anticipate a substantial increase in net migration and workers continue to seek nearby employment, we believe the Chatswood market has strong growth potential,” Johnson told Urban.

While moving away from their more traditional boutique developments, some of which only offer a handful of apartments, Johnson believes they will still be able to attract a similar clientele to which they are accustomed.

“While we don’t produce the size of boutique residential apartments we typically offer, we will always look to include oversized products,” Johnson said.

“We will do two-bedroom apartments of around 85m² to 90m², rather than the more traditional 70m² size of a regular two-bed apartment.”

Johnson says there will naturally be more investors given Chatswood’s strong transport infrastructure and job opportunities, but there will be inventory to suit every buyer.

Where the Bowen Street site is near Chatswood. Image credit: CoreLogic

“The three beds will be designed for those with children or looking to start a young family, and the two beds will suit young shoppers looking to work from home and entertain on location.”

Construction at the site is expected to begin in early 2024, with development to be released in stages. There are expected to be around 70 apartments developed in the first stage, at the start of the Bowen Street site.

A+ Design Group’s Tony Leung is currently working on the plans, with the development application due later this year.

The site has been secured alongside SPG’s funding and equity partner, Qualitas, and will add $250 million in revenue to SPG’s pipeline.

SPG recently burst into the Melbourne market, where they launched Euroka, a boutique collection of apartments in the heart of Toorak, one of Melbourne’s premier suburbs.

Euroka is inspired by Melbourne’s iconic Roy Grounds House, once home to one of Victoria’s most influential modern architects.

Renowned architect and design firm Carr Design created the 10 luxury apartments, including two ultra-luxury penthouses.

Mt. Bethel Christian Academy Sports Field Site Plan Approval

By Site plan

After several months of delays, the Cobb Board of Commissioners this week approved a site plan change on the North Campus of Mt. Bethel Christian Academy for the construction of an athletic field.

Since 2014, Mt. Bethel has operated a secondary school on Post Oak Tritt Road near Holly Springs Road.

The school obtained a special land use plan the previous year, stipulating that changes must come back to the commissioners. The SLUP included the future construction of a sports field and related facilities.

In 2019, Mt. Bethel Christian proposed a sports stadium, but later withdrew the request after community opposition surfaced.

The new site plan (above) was passed on the commission’s consent schedule after the private school worked out a new list of stipulations with nearby residents of the Holly Springs subdivision and the East Cobb Civic Association.

Mt. Bethel Christian attorney Kevin Moore filed the new site plan and letter of stipulation on Tuesday on March 9 (you can read here; you can read the zoning staff analysis by clicking here).

This includes moving the parking lot, removing an athletics track, creating an 85-foot undisturbed buffer between the lot and neighboring homes, and requiring the District Commissioner ( JoAnn Birrell) to approve the maximum land elevations.

Other provisions limit the range of lighting and the hours of operation of a public address system and public address system. The District Commissioner would also approve a final landscaping plan with community and ECCA reviews.

Approval comes after a few the neighbors objected to the proximity of the land in their backyards.

Commissioners voted in December delay the requestand Mt. Bethel requested another extension in February.

But at a zoning hearing on Tuesday, Birrell told affected parties “I appreciate you working with me in the background.”

The site plan changes also provide for the addition of 39 parking spaces for a total of 121 on campus.

Related Items:

Receive our free newsletter by e-mail!

Every Sunday we round up the week’s top headlines and preview the week ahead in the East Cobb News Digest. Click here to register, and you’re good to go!

Wawarsing OKs Sitemap for Marijuana Grower and Distributor – Daily Freeman

By Site plan

WAWARSING, NY — A whole new type of grass and up to 400 new jobs will soon be springing up in Ellenville, officials said this week.

On Tuesday, March 15, the Wawarsing Planning Board approved a site plan proposed by Cresco Labs, a Chicago-based national cannabis producer and marketer. Cresco will soon build a marijuana growing, processing, packaging and distribution facility in the former Kora Components building at 11 Aluminum Drive, city supervisor Terry Houck said Friday.

Ellenville Mayor Jeff Kaplan said Cresco still plans to purchase and renovate the former vacant Channel Master and Schrade knife company site on U.S. Route 209 adjacent to Aluminum Drive. Cresco has expanded its original proposal by purchasing the 10-acre Kora property and existing building, Kaplan said. He said negotiations were still ongoing regarding the Channel Master and Schrade sites.

The Kora purchase will allow Cresco to start its cannabis growing business sooner than it had anticipated, Kaplan said. He didn’t know the company’s schedule.

A spokesperson for the company could not be immediately reached on Friday.

Kora is transferring its operations to Liberty, Houck said.

In an emailed statement on Friday, Ulster County Executive Pat Ryan said: “Cresco Labs has taken a critical step in creating what will be one of the greatest economic opportunities we have had. in Ellenville for decades.” The executive said Project Cresco “will transform a site that was once the beating heart of this economy into the economic engine it can and should be – providing well-paying jobs for local residents and placing the county Ulster at the forefront of the rapidly growing cannabis industry.

In an emailed statement, County Economic Development Director Tim Weidermann called the planning board’s approval “a major milestone for an incredibly transformative project that is rapidly moving to shovels into the ground.”

When final approvals, state licenses and funding are secured, Wiedemann said Cresco promised to deliver “400 well-paying jobs (with benefits), over $200 million in investment, and the birth of a major new industry for the Rondout Valley, County of Ulster., and region.

Houck said he hadn’t seen a list of jobs the company expected to create, but he believed they would offer competitive benefits and salaries. He said Cresco employees are “well-treated and well-paid” and this will be the company’s 19th plant and 10th state in which they are setting up shop.

In an August email, a representative from Cresco Labs said the company is “excited about adult use and expanding our footprint in New York State – we know the economic impact that a large-scale cannabis facility can have on a community, and we look forward to continuing to work through the process with Ulster County at the Wawarsing site.

According to the company’s website, Cresco is “on a mission to standardize, professionalize and revolutionize cannabis.” The company, which operates 18 facilities in other states, including a medical cannabis dispensary on Long Island, describes itself as “the most trusted and fastest growing cannabis company in the world.”

At a press conference in August, Ryan said the company should employ local builders and “building partners” to develop the property. He said Cresco used to employ local workers.

Ulster County Executive Pat Ryan leads a press conference outside the George and John R. Hunt Memorial Building at 2 Liberty St. in Ellenville, NY on Wednesday afternoon, August 4, 2021, to announce a company of distribution of marijuana at the former Schrade knife-making plant in the town of Wawarsing, which sat vacant for about 17 years. (Tania Barricklo/Daily Freeman, File)

New York State legalized recreational marijuana in March 2021, and Ulster County is poised to become “one of the first communities in the state to house a major marijuana distribution facility,” it said. Ryan.

Reached by phone on Friday, Kaplan welcomed the new venture and said he was not concerned about the introduction of a marijuana facility in Wawarsing. “I’ve only heard positive things and we’re very excited about that,” the mayor said.

Kaplan said he’s also not worried about the arrival of a marijuana business in Ellenville or the possible development of cannabis dispensaries and cafes in the village. “No. It’s going to be controlled. I’m more concerned about people drinking than me. [them] consume cannabis. He said the Woodridge Village Police Chief told officials that “people who use cannabis are much less likely to be aggressive and fight than people who drink. He said they had a lot more trouble with bars than with people getting high.

In December, the Ellenville Village Board voted to allow dispensaries and recreational marijuana parlors in the village, and Kaplan said he believed they would encourage growth. “I think this will be a major asset in eliminating the neighborhood dealer and that people who want to use cannabis do not have to go to a dealer who sells heroin, cocaine and cannabis at the same time. ‘ecstasy….Once you start having to go to the illegal drug dealer to begin with, it’s much easier to take the next step.

He said having a few cannabis cafes in Ellenville “will just add to the whole experience that we’re trying to create there of a theater, a row of restaurants, which we’ve already created, and I think it will be a good add-on. And the fact that we have a local village with a local village police department to make sure things are done safely… is going to be a big help.

Wawarsing Town Council has chosen not to allow cafes or cannabis dispensaries outside the village boundaries.

Milton council hears appeal over cell tower site plan

By Site plan

Milton City Council is weighing whether to rescind preliminary site plan approval for Verizon’s proposed 140-foot cell phone tower on Front Street.

A decision on the appeal of Allen Benson, resident of Milton, will be made at the council meeting at 6:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 23, at the Milton Library.

At a March 9 appeal hearing, Benson made two arguments as to why he believes the planning and zoning commission erred in granting preliminary site plan approval.

First, he said, the planning and zoning did not take into account the negative impacts on neighboring properties when granting approval. Second, the city code states that no new utilities can be built in a flood zone, which is this part of Front Street.

“The issue that has been raised repeatedly is about increased flooding on Front Street by building this cell tower on a 50ft by 50ft platform in a designated flood zone. The basis for this appeal is that planning and zoning, contrary to city code requirements, never really considered the impact on the adjacent neighborhood,” Benson said.

The proposed Verizon Tower has been controversial from the start, primarily due to its location, which would be in the city’s current public works yard at 210 Front St. Verizon said the tower’s location and height will give the Better Cell Phone Coverage for Verizon Customers in Milton. Opponents, however, say the tower would be an eyesore in a part of town that is frequently flooded and is being proposed as a potential gateway to the town in Milton’s overall development plan, particularly after demolition and construction. removal of the current sewage treatment plant once Artesian’s new plant is on the road. 30 is operational.

Because the land is zoned residential R-1, Verizon had to obtain a special use permit from planning and zoning. This permit was granted and the decision was appealed to the city council in August.

In its decision, the council said the overall plan imagines what could be on this site, but also calls for the improvement of infrastructure services, which the tower would provide, and which planners have put in a state stipulating that Tower plans must comply with all state and federal rules and regulations. Council members said at the time that floodplain issues would be addressed through the site plan review process.

Planners approved preliminary site plans in November but attached several conditions that must be met before final approval, including geotechnical analysis of the site in wet and dry conditions, permits from the US Army Corps of Engineers , a construction sequence, no pile-driving allowed, runoff and flood analysis, vibration monitoring, and a promise that Verizon will maintain plantings around the site.

Benson said planners had not considered the effect on streets surrounding the tower, such as Collins and Walnut streets, and whether they would be able to handle the increased traffic the tower would bring. He said planners and city officials had not given due consideration to an alternative to building a tower, such as installing an antenna on an existing water tower.

“This project cannot move forward,” Benson said.

Presenting on behalf of planning and zoning, city attorney Seth Thompson said the commission considered the health, safety and welfare of the community in making its decision. He said the series of conditions placed on the approval were intended to address the flooding issue and that Verizon indicated that the platform where the tower would be placed is above the floodplain. Thompson said the commission questioned Verizon representative John Tracey at length about the flooding issue around Front Street, demonstrating that those concerns were addressed before the commission granted preliminary site plan approval. Finally, he said Verizon still needs approval from state agencies before final approval of the site plan.

Tracey presented on behalf of Verizon and reiterated that the commission addressed concerns about flooding in its Preliminary Site Plan Approval Terms. He said the commission, by a vote of 6 to 1, found the layout of the site acceptable and asked council to uphold the commission’s approval of the preliminary site plan.

“The planning commission carefully weighed the testimony of those before it,” Tracey said. “The planning commission acted in accordance with the law in an orderly and logical manner.”

Recusals and public comments

For this appeal hearing, the council had just four members, after three – councilor Randi Meredith and councilors John Collier and Sam Garde – recused themselves. Prior to the hearing, Collier announced that he was recusing himself due to prior statements about the case made on a public record. Meredith and Garde recused themselves before the meeting. Although council members did not have to publicly state the reason for their recusal, Meredith said after the meeting that she was unable to attend due to a death in the family.

Benson and Barry Goodinson of 313 Mill St., asked Mayor Ted Kanakos to recuse himself due to a ground lease he signed with Verizon in 2019. Kanakos refused to do so; attorney Glenn Mandalas, representing the city council because Thompson, the city attorney, represented the planning and zoning commission, told Goodinson he could take his complaint to the City’s Public Integrity Commission. Delaware for consideration. Goodinson previously appealed the planning and zoning decision to grant Verizon a special permitted use for the tower.

Public comments were exclusively against the tower.

Agnes Steele, 209 Collins St., requested that the matter be referred to the planning commission for reconsideration.

Ginny Weeks, 119 Clifton St., said nowhere in city code is a 140-foot cell tower permitted.

The comment period became tense after Goodinson asked Kanakos to recuse himself; Goodinson said Kanakos misled people as to why the tower was placed on Front Street. Steele then returned to the microphone and said Kanakos was sarcastic and seemingly frustrated with people voicing their concerns. Kanakos said it was the first time in six years as mayor that he was personally attacked in a meeting.

Public comments were then closed and Benson, Thompson and Tracey were allowed to make closing statements, reiterating their points. The city council chose to postpone the vote on the case so that it could consider all the evidence. The Board has several options it can pursue toward its expected March 23 decision: It can reject Benson’s appeal and uphold the panel’s decision; he can overrule the commission’s decision or send the matter back to planning and zoning for further review. The Board has 60 days to issue a written decision on the appeal.

Council rejects Neighbors sitemap – Times News Online

By Site plan

Published on March 17, 2022 at 2:07 p.m.

A power outage caused by high winds dampened but would not have extinguished the February 22 meeting of the Hellertown Borough Council, as its chairman Thomas Rieger, council members and attendees improvised – with Rieger broadcasting the session on Zoom with his laptop and a mobile wireless “hotspot” until the electricity was restored.

The most widespread topic of discussion was the resounding rejection of a revised proposal by Gabriel Solms of Lou Pektor’s Ashley Development Corporation in Bethlehem to transform the former Neighbors Home and Garden Center site at 42 Main St. between Walnut Street and Polk Valley Road into three -building apartment complex.

Since the plot is currently in a shopping center zoning district, the council would have to allow a waiver. When representatives for Ashley first presented their plans to council in November 2021, the site plan called for 142 apartments, which raised several concerns.

Despite changes to the plan that Solms and Associates presented to the board, members expressed many of the same reservations. Between “setting a precedent” for so-called “spot zoning,” as planning commissioner Liz Thompson said, and traffic and maintenance issues, most of the reception of the proposal was cold at best.

Some council members have expressed apprehension over what has been called an “explosion” of multi-family, mixed-use developments across the borough. Only Mayor David Heintzelman shared a positive view of the idea, saying there was worse than the 112-unit structure that could be built.

In the end, council decided to place the item on the agenda for the next meeting for the formal rejection of the zoning variance. Due to recent changes to Pennsylvania’s Sunshine Act, any such proposed motion must be made public before any action can be taken.

In addition, Borough Director Cathy Hartranft announced an electronics recycling and document shredding event scheduled for April 30 at Dimmick Park. The two-hour event is free for residents of the Borough of Hellertown only.

A discussion also took place on the Borough’s difficulty in obtaining bids for a renovation project for the Community Pool concession kiosk. Borough engineer Bryan Smith recommended reposting it and said contractors had been “extremely hesitant” due to supply chain and personnel issues. The board voted unanimously in favor of Smith’s suggestion.

Along the same lines, Hartranft and Rieger reiterated the need for candidates for various seasonal positions at the pool: a water sports manager, a ticket/concessions manager and lifeguards. “If we don’t get any of those, the pool can’t open,” Rieger said.

Hartranft noted that the borough has increased its salaries for the upcoming season and is offering a 50% reimbursement for the cost of lifeguard certification training.

press photo by Chris Haring Hellertown Planning Commission member Liz Thompson raises concerns about the proposed development of the Neighbors Home and Garden site.

The Neighbors Home and Garden site on Main Street in the borough has been vacant since its closure in 2020.

The Neighbors Home and Garden site on Main Street in the borough has been vacant since its closure in 2020.

PRESS PHOTOS BY CHRIS HARING The Neighbors Home and Garden site on Main Street in the borough has been vacant since closing in 2020.

Owen Sound approves site plan for former gas station

By Site plan

Content of the article

The site plan for the construction of a new shopping center on long-vacant land at Owen Sound’s “southern gateway” has been approved by council.

Advertisement 2

Content of the article

On Monday, council voted 7 to 2 in favor of the site plan for the property at the southwest corner of 10and East Street and 9and Avenue East, which once housed a gas station, but has been vacant since 2005. The plans for the property at 889 10and St. E. includes an approximately 4,300 square foot mall containing three retail units, including a drive-thru restaurant.

Sarj Mehat, part of the owners’ team, 1948654 Ontario Inc., said Tuesday he doesn’t yet know when construction will begin, but hopes it will be this year.

“I am happy that it has been approved and I hope we can move on to the next stage of its construction now,” Mehat said.

He said he will have to consult with tenants and contractors before finalizing a timetable on when work will start.

“With COVID in the air, the world has changed and it’s not as easy as it used to be,” Mehat said. “The intentions are good, the property will be developed and it’s only a matter of time.”

Mehat said he could not yet disclose who the tenants of the property will be.

With the approval of the site plan, council directed staff to introduce a by-law to authorize the mayor and clerk to sign a site plan agreement, service agreement and any other items required to implement site plan approval.

The property has the Travelodge to the north on 10and Street East while Tim Hortons is east across 9and East Ave. The property adjoins residential homes to the west and south.

Advertisement 3

Content of the article

In addition to the building, the property’s proposed site plan also includes 13 drive-thru waiting spaces, a 26-space parking lot, and two new right-hand and right-hand-only entrances from 10and East Street and 9and East Ave. The median out of 10and East Street must be extended to prevent illegal left turns into the property. There are plans for site maintenance, retaining walls and landscaping, according to a report in junior planner Jacklyn Iezzi’s Monday diary.

Because the property is in the area designated in the city’s official plan as the southern gateway to Owen Sound, the development requires “a high standard of urban design,” Iezzi’s report explains. The property is zoned Commercial Artery (C4).

Among the features incorporated into the site plan and landscape plan in support of this designation are the orientation of the building to the intersection “to create an attractive street edge”, with parking at the rear and to the side, wrought iron and masonry fencing consistent with the harbor and downtown areas and outdoor lighting along building facades, the report details.

A drawing of a proposed development for a vacant property at 889 10th St. E. On Monday, March 14, 2022, the Owen Sound City Council approved a site plan for the property which includes three commercial units, including a restaurant with drive-thru.
A drawing of a proposed development for a vacant property at 889 10th St. E. On Monday, March 14, 2022, the Owen Sound City Council approved a site plan for the property which includes three commercial units, including a restaurant with drive-thru. Photo provided

Landscaping is proposed and includes a mix of deciduous trees, coniferous and deciduous shrubs and perennials. It is also proposed to retain three existing trees along the west lot line.

Due to adjacent residential properties, an acoustic fence must be constructed along the west lot line, while the drive-thru is to be closed between 11 p.m. and 7 a.m. Retaining walls should be constructed along the south and west rear area of ​​the property.

Advertisement 4

Content of the article

On Thursday, some councilors raised concerns about the proposed development, including the high-traffic location, the frequency of collisions at the intersection and vehicle idling in the drive-thru.

Com. Scott Greig said he had significant concerns about the type of development.

“I thought it would be a great place for something like four or five story multi-residential housing, as we all know, which this community desperately needs,” said Greig, who also raised concerns about shortages. of labor and “another drive-thru only reduces the viability of existing alternative businesses.

Com. Carol Merton raised concerns about ‘information gaps’ regarding collisions at the intersection and an emissions assessment ‘particularly with a drive-thru’.

Community Services Director Pam Coulter said at Monday’s council meeting that a transportation impact study had been submitted, reviewed by city technical staff, and the findings were deemed acceptable. A noise study was also carried out. In 2010, the city’s comprehensive zoning ordinance was updated to prohibit new drive-thrus in the then downtown area, but drive-thru is permitted in other commercial areas both in the city’s official plan and zoning regulations, Coulter explained.

Many other councilors have spoken out in favor of the development, including Coun. Richard Thomas, who said it’s good to see a development coming up for a brownfield property in a high visibility location.

“Lately around this table, the idea has crept more and more into discussions that we should be telling developers what to develop in Owen Sound,” Thomas said. “I don’t see that as the board’s role.”

Deputy Mayor Brian O’Leary expressed support for the proposal, which meets all development standards and is consistent with the official plan and zoning by-law.

O’Leary said that in the past developers had been unwilling to work in the city because of the “board getting in the way”.

Advertisement 1

comments

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively yet civil discussion forum and encourages all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments can take up to an hour to be moderated before appearing on the site. We ask that you keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications. You will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, if there is an update to a comment thread you follow, or if a user follows you comments. Visit our Community Rules for more information and details on how to adjust your E-mail settings.

Maryland Introduces Washington Commanders to Sprawling FedEx Field Development

By Site development

Newly obtained documents show that Prince George’s and the state have developed an expanded vision for a five-mile economic development corridor to surround a new stadium, similar to Virginia’s “mini-city” approach. state and county told the team in confidential documents that Prince George’s would help further team president Jason Wright’s goals for a stadium project that is also progressing social justice initiatives.

Maryland is clearly willing to spend big on stadiums. Lawmakers are proposing a plan to invest $1.2 billion to upgrade the state’s other two major professional sports stadiums in Baltimore. But, so far, heads of state have not introduced legislation to implement the commanders’ speech.

And if Prince George’s loses the commanders and the multi-billion dollar project to build a new team stadium, the county would face an economic crater.

“I ask you to remember Prince George’s County,” Alsobrooks said in his first public appeal for money for the stadium proposal. “Residents of Prince George’s County deserve the same commitment and resources.

A spokesperson for the commanders said Wednesday that the FedEx Field site, where team owner Daniel Snyder already owns more than 200 acres, is the only site the team is considering in Maryland.

The 89-page pitch, delivered to the team in May and obtained by The Washington Post this week, offers the most detailed look yet at how a government vying for the team offered much more than incentives. economic or state-funded stadium.

He describes a “stadium district” that would not only anchor acres of sports-related development – ​​including a hotel, convention center, shops, homes and an on-site sports betting site – but also funnel billions into a predominantly black jurisdiction that local leaders say have been repeatedly left behind.

“We believe the prospect of a new stadium represents an opportunity for even greater long-term impacts, serving as a driver for equitable and inclusive economic development and social justice,” the pitch reads.

Yet in the months that followed, Maryland leaders failed to submit a financial proposal for public debate, even as Virginia lawmakers advanced a lucrative bid for a stadium in northern Virginia. The team searched for a new stadium site for years, pitting the two states and the district against each other. Commanders are contractually obligated to play in Landover, Maryland until 2027.

Maryland’s proposal included a 65,000-seat indoor stadium as the development’s crown jewel, built just east of FedEx Field and atop the current parking lots, placing the stadium a 15-20 minute walk from a station. metro. The stadium-district concept is similar to those implemented with Truist Park outside of Atlanta, SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California outside of Los Angeles, and Nationals Park in southeast Los Angeles. Washington, which ushered in acres of redevelopment near the DC waterfront.

In Landover, the redevelopment vision would use the stadium to anchor the five-mile investment corridor. It would run along Central Avenue and four Blue Line stops from the DC boundary at Capitol Heights to downtown Largo, east of FedEx Field. The county has already begun investing resources in the “Blue Line Corridor”, with the goal of turning it into an urban extension of DC

Over 10 years, according to the pitch, the FedEx Field site would house nearly 4 million square feet of development, with rooms set aside to ensure minority-owned businesses benefit from the windfall. There would be four training grounds alongside the team headquarters, as well as public parks and 2,100 homes – many of which are designated as affordable housing, to help black families build “generational wealth”, says the ground.

The campus would be integrated into the community, hosting a K-8 charter school, a field for 16 basketball and volleyball courts, and a “team culture and history museum.”

Parts of the campus would be connected by a pedestrian and bicycle path, part of which would be an elevated bridge. He would be nicknamed the “Bobby Mitchell Greenway”, in honor of the team’s first black player.

“It can demonstrate how corporate partnerships can innovate equity, education, recreation and social justice initiatives,” the proposal states.

Money for Baltimore stadiums, but not for commanders

Although the proposal bore the signatures of Alsobrooks and Gov. Larry Hogan (R), Alsobrooks’ call to Annapolis on Tuesday signaled that the plan has yet to gain widespread local approval like Virginia’s. Hogan publicly rejected on Tuesday the idea that the state would build a stadium for a team, even though he supports investing in those of the Orioles and Ravens.

In May’s proposal to commanders, Maryland highlighted the Maryland Stadium Authority’s decades of experience with professional sports venues, likely to contrast with Virginia, which is expected to create a football stadium authority in the next special session. of the Commonwealth.

Hogan’s spokesman, Michael Ricci, downplayed the governor’s May field signing, calling it a “marketing piece” that “consists largely of pro forma information and boilerplate language regarding the capabilities of state agencies to help the team develop facilities.”

Ricci added, however, that Maryland “will continue to provide support and expertise to the county in its discussions with the team.”

A bill being considered Tuesday in Annapolis would allow the Maryland Stadium Authority to inject $600 million into upgrading the Orioles’ Camden Yards and an additional $600 million into the Ravens’ M&T Bank stadium. But efforts to amend the bill to include commanders have not moved forward, prompting public advocacy from Alsobrooks.

Prince George’s proposal suggests the team could, as in the Virginia plan, get a reduction in taxes generated by the new development – a feature that has not been publicly discussed. The county also had no plans to eventually expand tax incentives to reduce costs and attract further development around the stadium, including the team’s headquarters and practice facilities.

In an analysis, the proposal touted the viability of the FedEx Field site while pointing out the flaws of alternative sites the team had once considered, such as Landover Mall (“relatively small site with high acquisition costs”), Oxon Cove (“large site, but not near Metrorail” and “environmental constraints limit development potential”) and Greenbelt (“limited space on site” and “would compete with proposed FBI headquarters”).

The Commanders spokesperson said that after working with the county executive’s office, the team decided to focus on the FedEx location in Maryland.

Regional competition heats up

DC Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) outlined plans on Wednesday to build a $60 million indoor athletics stadium on the RFK Stadium campus as part of an effort to demonstrate his commitment to building a sports entertainment district and attracting the team. the. “I think world-class cities have their football team within their city limits,” Bowser told reporters.

In Virginia, Wright, the team’s president, met with Loudoun County officials on Tuesday to discuss the team’s concept for a new stadium and retail complex, likely near a quarry northeast of Virginia. Dulles International Airport, Loudoun officials said.

County Board Chairwoman Phyllis J. Randall (D-At Large) called the introductory meeting saying, “They went through a very high-level idea of ​​what they want to come up with, if they were going to come up with Something.”

If commanders were to relocate to Loudoun at two other possible sites in neighboring Prince William County, Randall said, she would like the team to be more transparent about its issues of sexual assault allegations, which make the under investigation by Congress.

“I don’t particularly care who you are, what entity or individual you are – I will always stand on the side of listening and supporting women,” she said.

Prince William’s officials said they have yet to meet with commanders.

As jurisdictions seek the financial windfall a project would bring, Maryland leaders are also seeking to avoid the economic devastation that would be left behind if FedEx Field were abandoned.

“I have thousands of voters who live within a mile whose property values ​​will drop if they have an empty stadium in their backyard,” Del said. Jazz Lewis (D-Prince George’s), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, whose district includes FedEx Field.

“We’re just looking for parity,” Lewis said, referring to the state’s willingness to invest $1.2 billion to retain Baltimore’s stadiums.

Whether or not the county keeps the team, Alsobrooks said getting resources to the Blue Line Corridor is a primary goal of his administration.

“This is our next opportunity,” she said. It is also, she said, the “best opportunity for commanders to achieve their vision of long-term economic sustainability.”

Antonio Olivo and Julie Zauzmer Weil contributed to this report.

The Outer Banks Voice – Wawa submits site plan to City of KDH

By Site plan

Wawa Submits Site Plan to KDH City

By Michelle Wagner | Outer Banks Voice on March 14, 2022

Wawa, Inc. has submitted a commercial site plan to the City of Kill Devil Hills requesting permission to build one of its popular gas stations and convenience stores at 1900 N. Croatan Highway, located on the west side of the highway just south of BB&T and across from the old Kmart.

Kill Devil Hills Deputy Director of Planning Cameron Ray told The Voice in an email that the application was submitted by Arista Development on Wawa’s behalf and included a 6,000 square foot Wawa convenience store, awning with gas pumps and 53 parking spaces. Wawa is popular for its made-to-order meals, freshly brewed coffee, hot breakfast sandwiches, and other Wawa-branded items.

Wawa, Inc.’s external public relations supervisor, Jennifer Wolf, confirmed that the company has its eye on Kill Devil Hills as well as other locations in North Carolina, with the opening of the first stores of by the end of 2024. Wawa has more than 850 convenience stores, 600 of them offering gasoline, in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, Florida and Washington, D.C., but n currently has no location in North Carolina.

“We are thrilled to confirm that we are expanding in North Carolina,” Wolf said in an email to The Voice. “While we cannot confirm specific locations or construction timelines at this stage in the process, we can say that we are actively seeking potential sites for new Wawa stores in North Carolina, including Kill Devil Hills,” said she declared.

In January, Wawa came to Kill Devil Hills to request a waiver for primary access to US 158 at the same site. This request was denied by the Kill Devil Hills Board of Adjustment because city code requires that corner lots along US 158 have driveway access on the side street rather than on the freeway with the aim of minimizing driveways along the freeway.

Wawa’s current site plan was submitted on February 28 and is currently being reviewed by staff. Deputy Director of Planning Ray said he will likely go to the Kill Devil Hills Planning Board in April for review and then to the Board of Commissioners in May.

Wawa, the website says, is a Native American word for the Canada goose that was found in the Delaware Valley over 100 years ago. The original Wawa Dairy Farm was also built in 1902 on land located in the rural area of ​​Pennsylvania called Wawa.

For his part, Wolf concluded, “We look forward to serving the community with our fresh, quality food and beverages and, as always, our deep commitment to the communities in which we operate.



PUBLIC NOTICE

STATE OF WISCONSIN – CIRCUIT COURT – ADAMS COUNTY
CREATIVE FUNDING, INC.
815 Commercial Park Road
Box 454
Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965,
Case No. 21CV148
Applicant,
v.
RANDALL SCOTT SCOTT
106 Charlotte Street
Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina 27948
Respondent.

ASSIGNMENT

THE STATE OF WISCONSIN
To each person named above as a defendant:
You are hereby notified that the plaintiff named above Creative Finance, Inc., by its attorney, Christopher M. Kern, has commenced a lawsuit or other legal action against you.
Within forty (40) days of February 21, 2022, you must respond with a written request for a copy of the Complaint. The request should be sent or delivered to the court, whose address is: Clerk of Circuit Court, Adams County Courthouse, 402 Main Street, PO Box 220, Friendship, Wisconsin 53934, and to the plaintiff’s attorney, Christopher M. Kern , 815 Business Park Road, PO Box 454, Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin, 53965. An attorney can help or represent you.
If you do not provide an appropriate response within forty (40) days, the Court may enter judgment against you for an award of money or other legal action sought in the Complaint, and you may lose your right to object to anything that is or may be incorrect in the Complaint. A judgment may be executed under the conditions provided by law. A judgment awarding a sum of money can become a lien on any real estate you currently own or in the future, and can also be enforced by garnishment or seizure of property.
As of February 21, 2022.
Plaintiff’s General Counsel
Signed by: Christopher M. Kern
Christopher M. Kern
Status bar number: 1093883
CreativeFinance, Inc.
815 Commercial Park Road
Box 454
Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965
Phone: (608) 254-6855
Fax: (608) 253-5005
[email protected]



PUBLIC NOTICE

NC- INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY – ALBAMARLE
SOUND TO NEUSE RIVER ALLIGATOR RIVERSECOND CREEK-ALLIGATOR RIVER

All interested parties are advised that the Coast Guard Fifth District Commander has received a proposal from the North Carolina Department of Transportation, with plans for modifying a
existing drawbridge over a United States waterway.

WATERWAY AND LOCATION: Alligator River, Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Mile 84.2, in Columbia, North Carolina.

CHARACTER OF WORK: The proposed project is to replace the 2.83 mile long 2-lane swing-span drawbridge with a two-lane high-rise fixed bridge on a new alignment of approximately
2,000 feet north of the existing bridge. The objective of the project is to replace a bridge that is structurally deficient and undergoing significant deterioration, due to its age, and to avoid having to carry out
thorough maintenance of obsolete mining machinery.

The existing drawbridge has a horizontal clearance of 100 feet on each side of the swing span and a vertical clearance of 14 feet above mean high water in the closed position and unlimited vertical clearance in the open position. The replacement bridge will be a fixed bridge with a horizontal clearance of 140 feet and a vertical clearance of 65 feet above mean high water.

A copy of Preliminary Public Notice D05PPN-02-2022, which describes the proposal in detail, can be obtained by calling (757) 398-6222 or by visiting https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/ ?pageName=pnBridges . Comments on this proposal should be sent to the address indicated in the notice no later than April 01, 2022.

Those who do not speak English or who have a limited ability to read, speak or understand English can receive interpretation services upon request by calling 1-800-481-6494.
Aquellas personas no hablan inglés, o tienen limitaciones para leer, hablar o intender inglés, podrían recibir servicios de interpretación si los solicitan llamando al 1-800-481-6494.


Chronicle: Meeting on the development of the site of the former prison well attended | News, Sports, Jobs

By Site development

ESCANABA – On March 8, the Escanaba City Council hosted a special meeting for the public to get a first-hand look at proposals from four development teams seeking to use the former Delta County Jail and the former chamber commerce property as a blank canvas to paint their vision of Escanaba’s latest lakeside addition. In my humble opinion, all the proposals have very positive economic impacts on the future of the region. Everyone will have a favorite proposal that they would like to see move forward and become a reality. Delta County and the City of Escanaba could benefit from any of these projects and I would love to see more than one come to fruition. Who wouldn’t love more commercial expansion, more hospitality venues to support tourism and luxury living spaces. They are all in high demand. As impressed as I was with the developer presentations, I was very excited to see the great audience participation to better understand the projects. The live audience was so large that a satellite section had to be set up in the lobby for people to sit and watch the meeting on television. There was also a large audience of viewers online. Whatever proposal our elected municipal officials choose, I hope we all understand that it may not be perfect, but it will be very good. This could be a starting point for further development in housing, tourism, small business expansion and job creation that our citizens outlined in the 2016 Escanaba City Master Plan. We may have different opinions on how to start this journey, but I think we all know we have to move on. Our mayor made an important announcement at the meeting that many of us might have overlooked towards the end of the session. Mr. Ammel reviewed the many openings on the Escanaba Town Board at this time. Many of our municipalities and service groups need energetic new people to join their group. Adding new people will bring new ideas and perspectives that will help all of our teams be more successful.

The past two years have been very difficult to get involved with new groups as we have been asked to socially distance and attend meetings remotely. We see life returning to a kind of new normal as we started 2022. It’s time to get involved and make a difference, even if it’s very small, it will benefit the larger group.

There are many opportunities to help, if not now, when? Everyone is busy, but make your involvement this year a priority for you. We will all be better thanks to your involvement!

I had the opportunity to participate in a meeting with a service club last week as they recruit new members and highlight all they can do to make a positive difference in our community. I have known the organization for a long time, having played in Little League and Babe Ruth League Baseball for the Kiwanis club. I always appreciated their sponsorship as a young man and grew to appreciate all the efforts that organizations like Kiwanis made to make a difference. The Kiwanis Club will celebrate its 100th anniversary at Hereford & Hops on March 16 from 5-7 p.m. Come tell them how much you appreciate what the organization has done over the years.

— — —

Ed Legault is Executive Director of the Delta County Economic Development Alliance.



Today’s breaking news and more to your inbox






03/11/2022 | Site Plan Approved for Berlin Activity Depot Expansion

By Site plan

Site Plan Approved for Berlin Activity Depot Expansion

BERLIN — The Berlin Planning Commission has approved a site plan for an extension and addition to the Berlin Activity Repository. On Wednesday, the commission approved plans to upgrade Berlin’s business depot on Old Ocean City Boulevard. The project, which will be done in phases, will begin with an addition to the side of the building…

Learn more »

Work on the Highway 50 bridge will include lane closures

Work on the Highway 50 bridge will include lane closures

OCEAN CITY — The State Highway Administration of the Maryland Department of Transportation will perform routine inspections of the Route 50 bridge next week. Officials say inspections will begin Monday, March 14, weather permitting, with crews working from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily on the bridge. The work should be completed by 5:00 p.m. on Friday…

Learn more »

OAR to headline new beach festival

OAR to headline new beach festival

OCEAN CITY — After months of speculation and anticipation, more details have emerged about the proposed major three-day music festival in Inlet in September, which includes Maryland-based OAR as a lead player. Last August, Director of Tourism and Business Development, Tom Perlozzo, and C3 Presents Founder and Promoter, Tim Sweetwood, pitched the idea of ​​a…

Learn more »

Townhouse project moves forward in Berlin

Townhouse project moves forward in Berlin

BERLIN — Plans for a new townhouse development on Old Ocean City Boulevard are moving forward after discussions with the city’s planning commission. The Berlin Planning Commission voted 6-0 on Wednesday to provide a favorable recommendation for a text amendment that would allow fee simple townhouse developments in Berlin. “It’s just another way to grow…

Learn more »

Glamping site plan for farmland in Aldham rejected

By Site plan

PLANS to set up a glamping site on farmland in Aldham have been rejected after a council decided there would be no ‘overriding public benefits’.

A change of use application to place four wooden glamping pods on the Tey Road plot in Aldham was submitted in January.

The land is used for raising sheep, alpacas and rare breed poultry.

The plans have been proposed due to “challenges in the agricultural sector” which have resulted in a “significantly reduced” scale of operations.

The planning statement read: “The proposed development site is a serene countryside enclave located in the rural heart of the borough of Colchester.

“The proposed concept is to offer visitors a quaint luxury retreat away from the buzz of the urban environment, surrounded by farm animals and patchwork landscapes.

“With the low density of this proposal of just four small holiday units, the site will provide a private sanctuary for overnight stays in the neighborhood, with the benefits of central Aldham just a 10 minute walk away.

“The proposed development will provide luxury accommodation for people who enjoy outdoor recreation and the serenity of a countryside getaway with magnificent views.”

Read more:

But Colchester Council has now rejected the plans.

The denial notice said the plans “would not result in any overriding public benefit”.

He said the proposed land use change “would fail to retain the rural character of the area due to the loss of part of the characteristic agricultural estate”.

He also said there were also potential negative effects on tranquility due to increased activity due to increased traffic movement on and off the motorway and the introduction of a access road and a hard surfaced parking area and an inability to respond to the historic settlement pattern.

He added: ‘As far as can be judged from the plans submitted, the proposal does not provide a reasonable degree of intervisibility between access users and those already on the motorway, which which will constitute a danger for pedestrians and motorists contrary to road safety. ”

The final reason for refusal was for a tree on the site, as the plans were not supported by a tree constraint plan or tree impact assessment.

Magistrate approves site plan for large apartment development near Millennium Park

By Site plan

A site plan for a large apartment development next to Wildwood’s Millennium Park was approved by Special Magistrate Lindsay CT Holt with conditions at a Tuesday meeting of the Wildwood Planning and Zoning Board.

The site plan for the initial phase of the project calls for 278 apartments, 10 carriage houses and 42 townhouses on approximately 22 acres.

The plan is part of a $110 million mixed-use development proposed a year ago by Blount Development Group of Wildwood and Chance Wildwood, a Delaware company. The entire development comprises 320 one- to three-bedroom apartments with no age limit, 150 self-catering senior apartments and 100,000 square feet of medical and office space.

Holt said the issues need to be resolved before the site plan is approved by the city commission. They include easements for connections to access roads and easements for the construction of retention basins.

Apartments should include a mix of townhouses, duplexes, carriage houses and garden-style units. A resort-style pool, fitness center, clubhouse, outdoor barbecue grills, and walking paths are among the planned amenities.

The site plan shows apartment buildings arranged in a square around a central area with parking and landscaping. A dog park and dog wash can be found at the northwest corner of the site and several bike racks are marked.

The project’s location near the center of Wildwood means that tenants will have easy access to the Wildwood Community Center, Millennium Park and Brownwood’s shops and restaurants. Children can cycle or walk to school or walk to school.

Application, site plan submitted for solar project

By Site plan

A photo simulation provided by Orion Renewables illustrates what the solar farm project could look like to passers-by on the north side of Bowers Road in Goodland Township.

GODLAND TWP. – A California-based renewable energy company that plans to build a $100 million solar farm in Goodland Township has submitted a special application for a land use permit, along with a site plan to officials of the township for the proposed development.

Goodland Township Supervisor Ron Cischke said a representative from Orion Renewable Energy Group delivered the documents to City Hall on Feb. 18. “There are no public hearings scheduled on their application and site plan yet. There’s a lot to do before we get to that,” Cischke said.

Copies of Orion Renewables’ application and site plan, Cischke said, will be forwarded to the Goodland Township Planning Commission, the township’s legal counsel and the Building Code Authority and to other related agencies for review and comment prior to scheduling public hearings.

“We have talked about it, and it is possible that there will be two public hearings. One for the special land use permit application and one for the site plan, but that will be up to the Planning Commission to determine,” Cischke said. “That probably won’t happen until their April meeting at the earliest.”

The proposed site plan illustrates in blue where solar panels would be installed on 13 parcels in southeastern Goodland Township.

The proposed site plan illustrates in blue where solar panels would be installed on 13 parcels in southeastern Goodland Township.

Amanda Hoffman, project development manager for Orion Renewables, was not told of any scheduled meetings regarding the company’s filings with Goodland Township.

Orion Renewables plans to build a 100 megawatt solar farm which will be bounded by Bowers Road to the south, Shaw Road to the north, and Cade and Sisson roads to the east and west in the southeast corner of the township. Hoffman said Orion’s proposed project will be located on property owned by 13 local landowners that covers 1,713 acres – although only 689 acres are expected to have solar installations.

The proposed project has been pitted neighbor against neighbor by opponents and individuals who would have signed leases with Orion Renewables to use their land for up to 25 years, in return for payments from the company.

A photo simulation of what the solar farm project on Shaw Road might look like.

A photo simulation of what the solar farm project on Shaw Road might look like.

Orion Renewables said that in the first year of operation, if Goodland Township officials allow it, the township could realize more than $750,000 in property taxes from the development.

In a recent statement to the Departmental press, Hoffman said property owners who sign with the company will receive millions of dollars in lease payments and more than $8 million in property taxes for Goodland Township over a 25-year period.

Goodland Township’s zoning ordinance permits solar energy projects in the community, provided the applicant company receives a special land use permit to build the project on land currently used for residential and agricultural purposes .

Site plan review process by the Planning Commission, subject to public review and comment, details of where the proposed development would be built, including the location of inverters and substations on the leased plots.

The site plan, including photo simulations of what the proposed development might look like for passers-by on local roads, can be found at www.goodlandsolarproject.com.

City Council meets the second Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. The next meeting will be March 8 at City Hall, 2374 N. Van Dyke Rd.

The Goodland Township Planning Commission will meet March 17 at 7 p.m.

Donut Development LLC receives approval for rezoning and site plan

By Site plan

RINCON — Rejoice, pumpkin spice lovers!

During Monday’s regular Rincon City Council meeting, Donut Development LLC owner Jay Andrews said a Dunkin’ store is set to open on 12th Street this fall.

Andrews appeared before council to seek approval of a site plan for commercial space with three units, including Dunkin’. Jersey Mike’s Subs and T-Mobile are ready for others.

The inclusion of T-Mobile necessitated a rezoning (office commercial to general commercial). After agreeing to a rezoning, which came before the site plan was given the go-ahead, council peppered Andrews with a few questions.

Councilor Reese Browher asked, “Mr. Andrews, what is the timeline for this project? »

Browher, joking lightly, said he gets more questions about Dunkin’ and Jersey Mike’s Subs than about any other topic.

“There’s a lot of anticipation for it to be open,” he said.

Andrews responded confidently.

“We’re looking at around seven months,” he said.

Councilman Patrick Kirkland asked Andrews about the traffic of customers who use Dunkin’s drive-thru.

“They’ll come into 12th Street, then they’ll turn left from 12th Street at the back of the development, and they’ll come into the drive-thru – what we call stacking – and people will come into line . . said Andrews.

Kirkland expressed additional concern after Andrews’ response.

“…there is an average stacking required and this site actually has (space for) two more cars than the average for Dunkin’ in terms of stacking,” Andrews continued. “We feel like we’ve accommodated that too much.”

Andrews added an interesting tidbit.

“Seventy-three percent of Dunkin’s patronage is done before 10:30 a.m.,” he said.

After council approved the site plan, Mayor Ken Lee joked with Andrews.

“It’s a great tactic to be called Donut Development,” he said. “We cannot refuse a donut development. I don’t know how that would work.

Earlier in the meeting, the board approved a site plan for a 5,098 square foot extension to Wal-Mart for online pickup.