Skip to main content
Monthly Archives

May 2021

Venice town planning council to review site plan for rehabilitation hospital

By Site plan

VENICE – The Venice Town Planning Commission will examine the site and the development plan of a offer a rehabilitation hospital with 42 beds which would be operated by Post Acute Medical, just south of the new Sarasota Memorial Hospital Venice campus.

The proposed five-acre campus would house a 48,600 square foot facility and include a therapeutic garden. The entrance would be off Curry Lane, which is on the east side of Pinebrook Road, just south of the Sarasota Memorial Hospital Venice Campus

The proposed PAM rehabilitation hospital in Venice would be the first of its kind opened in the state of Florida by Post Acute Medical in Enola, Pa.

This rendering shows a patient wing of the Post-Acute Medical Rehabilitation Hospital Project.

Post Acute also operates the PAM Specialty Hospital in Sarasota at 6150 Edgelake Drive, Sarasota, north of Bee Ridge Road and east of Interstate 75.

The inauguration of the rehabilitation hospital is slated for the third quarter of this year and completion is expected by the end of 2022.

The Venice facility would also offer outpatient rehabilitation services.

In other news:Experts urge residents to prepare for start of storm season

And:Sarasota County Law Enforcement Attends Suicide Prevention Workshop

Sarasota Memorial’s 365,000-square-foot full-service hospital is slated to open by the end of this calendar year, with construction slated for late 2022.

The proposed rehabilitation hospital is immediately east of a medical complex project which would be located on an adjacent 10 acre property owned by Casto Southeast Realty.

At least two other medical office buildings are targeted for separate plots in Sarasota County, on the north side of Laurel Road, west of the hospital.

This rendering shows the ambulance entrance to the Post Acute Medical Rehabilitation Hospital Project.

The planning committee meets at 1:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber of Venice City Hall, 401 W. Venice Ave., Venice.

The public hearing on the site and the development plan is the first item on the agenda, after approval of the minutes.

Some members of the town planning committee can participate via Zoom.

The meeting will also be simultaneously broadcast live on the City’s website and via Zoom.

You can listen to the meeting by phone by dialing 1-929-205-6099 and when the meeting ID is requested, enter 856 0118 4333 then press the # key.

It can be viewed online at https://venice.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. Click on “In progress” on the far right of the Town Planning Commission meeting on that date.

Public comment can be provided in writing to [email protected] or by regular mail to City Clerk Lori Stelzer, 401 W. Venice Avenue, Venice, FL 34285.

Provide your full name and home address and, if you are a city business owner, provide the business name and address.

All comments received by noon on June 1 will be distributed to Planning Committee members and appropriate staff prior to the start of the meeting.

For Zoom, the meeting link https://us02web.zoom.us/w/85601184333 or on a Zoom application with the ID 856 0118 4333.

To request a virtual speaking, you must complete the Request to speak form, available at the address http://venicefl.formstack.com/forms/requesttospeak.

You must complete all required information or the form cannot be submitted.

Those in attendance in person can fill out a speaker card at the meeting, though the city still encourages virtual participation due to COVID-19 social distancing.

For more information or for assistance with questions for public comment, contact Lori Stelzer, City Clerk, [email protected] or 941-882-7390. For questions about connecting to the meeting: Christophe St. Luce, Chief Information Officer, [email protected] or 941-882-7425.

Earle Kimel primarily covers southern Sarasota County for the Herald-Tribune and can be contacted at [email protected] Support local journalism with a digital subscription to the Herald-Tribune.

The final site plan for the Lindbom lot goes to the Brighton Planning Commission

By Site plan

The final site plan for West Village Townhomes in Brighton will be presented to the city planning committee on June 7th.

The Brighton Planning Commission will hold a public audience on the future of the 10.5-acre parcel at 1010 State St.

SR Jacobson Development Corp. plans to purchase the property and build 140 townhouses and a lodge with swimming pool. The firm seeks a planning unit agreement, or PUD, with the city.

If approved, the Bingham Farms-based developer can shut down the property, which RJB Holding Group currently owns, according to property records.

“We plan to start construction in mid-fall,” said SR Jacobson vice president Manny Kianicky. “We are doing whatever we need to do to get full city approvals.

The lot is home to Lindbom Primary School, which closed in 2010 due to budget cuts. If all goes according to plan, the school will be demolished this fall, Kianicky said.

The old Lindbom Elementary in Brighton is vacant on Wednesday 12 September 2018.

The proposal was slated for a planning commission in early May, but was delayed until the results of a traffic survey were completed.

Brighton Community Development Director Michael Caruso said the traffic study predicted a minor increase in traffic due to the addition of the townhouses.

“But if the primary school was functioning, there would be a lot more traffic,” Caruso said.

A constant concern with the property is that it is a brownfield site. It is based on a plume of groundwater contamination from a former manufacturing site at 525 N. Fifth St.

The air in several houses above this plume has been tested and found to have high levels of trichlorethylene. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the chemical can cause dizziness, headache, confusion, liver damage and, in some cases, death.

Kianicky said the plume is 14 feet below ground so it’s unlikely to affect residents.

The development will be hooked up to the municipal water supply, so groundwater will not be an issue, and the site plan includes vapor barriers that will be installed in the slabs to prevent air contamination.

Contact Sara Kellner at [email protected] Follow her on Twitter @ skellner21.

Kentucky Power grants $ 35,375 for the development of the Hager Hill industrial site

By Site development

ASHLAND, Ky. (WTVQ) – The Johnson County Tax Court has received funding of $ 35,275 from an economic development grant from Kentucky Power for improvements to the Hager Hill industrial site. The grant is funded by the Kentucky Power Economic Growth Grant (KPEGG) program.

The grant will help the design and engineering phase of Johnson County’s plan to achieve Build-Ready certification for the site. This certification is a Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development program designed to make sites more marketable for potential businesses. According to Kentucky Power, this proves to a company that unknown roadblocks have been removed, site due diligence has been completed, and the project’s implementation schedule has been sped up significantly.

“One of the most important aspects of economic development is having sites ready for business. Johnson County’s work at Hager Hill is a great fit for the KPEGG program, as one of its primary goals is site development, ”said Kentucky Power President Brett Mattison. “We commend the Johnson County Tax Court for their investment in the project and look forward to working with them to bring investment and jobs to eastern Kentucky. “

The KPEGG program makes it possible to finance economic development programs or projects that encourage the creation and maintenance of manufacturing activities as well as industrial investment and employment. The program has completed its fourth annual cycle. Last year, 19 grants were awarded for economic development efforts in Kentucky Power’s service territory, totaling $ 859,175.

Funding for the program comes from the Kentucky Economic Development Surcharge. Kentucky Power explains that for every $ 1 dollar collected monthly from non-residential customers, the company’s shareholders match customer contributions dollar for dollar to generate nearly $ 800,000 per year for investments at the local and regional levels. The program is available in the 20 counties served by Kentucky Power.

Grant applications are reviewed by a committee made up of employees and delegates of the Kentucky Association of Economic Development and the Kentucky Economic Development Cabinet.

You can find more information at https://kentuckypower.com/development/.

Greasezilla Announces Sheltowee CleanTech Fund Investment for New Site Development

By Site development

LANSING, W. Va., May 24, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Downey Ridge Environmental Company, developer of Greasezilla™ FOG Separation and Processing Systems, Announces Sheltowee CleanTech Fund I, LLC, is Investing Over $8 million to expand the Greasezilla technology nationwide. Greasezilla will invest the capital to build ten new Greasezilla FOG receiving stations with private and public joint ventures across the country.

Eric DobsonCEO of Sheltowee CleanTech Fund, said, “This is our second investment in Greasezilla. The company first caught our attention for its unique ability to convert FOG waste into energy with an exceptional return on investment. Greasezilla has created a viable and lucrative business. model to advance waste reduction, water harvesting and biofuel production initiatives for concrete advances in a more sustainable world.”

Greasezilla is the leading provider of solutions to manage the overabundance of FOG created by food establishments and industrial food production facilities worldwide. Originally developed for independent grease haulers, Greasezilla’s ability to turn the FOG waste problem into a sustainable energy source addresses larger infrastructure, environmental and energy issues. As a result, Greasezilla finds significant market opportunities in wastewater treatment facilities, food processing plants, independent pumps, biofuels and biodiesel production.

“Our systems efficiently turn a negative value waste stream into resources while generating unparalleled profitability for operators, both from FOG treatment costs and biofuel sales. No other technology in the industry can match it. “, said Brian LevinEVP, Downey Ridge Environmental Company, “Greasezilla will use the funding to place FOG separation systems across the country in joint ventures, fueling its growth as one of the fastest growing clean technology companies.”

Greasezilla changes the paradigm of FOG disposal by replacing traditional landfill and incineration practices with a resource recovery model. By separating FOG into its basic components, Greasezilla generates a consolidated advanced brown fat (ABF) biofuel that can be sold as a commodity. ABF, with less than one percent moisture content, also provides an ideal, inexpensive, conversion-ready feedstock for biodiesel producers.

To learn more about Greasezilla’s FOG separation system and international biofuel distribution network, visit www.greasezilla.com. For more information about Sheltowee’s syndicated private equity network, visit www.sheltowee.com.

Media Contact:
Brian Levin
Downey Ridge Environmental Society
[email protected]

SOURCE Downey Ridge Environmental Company

Planners to Consider Addition of Site Plan Review | Local news

By Site plan

With the increase in residential developments that do not meet the requirements of having to be approved by planners and the influx of high-density subdivisions, members of the Crossville Regional Planning Commission on Thursday approved a resolution that would resolve the issues. two problems adding a site review process. .

Actions taken at the regular meeting in May do not set a plan, but require city staff to consider what best meets the needs of city residents through a plan review process. implantation.

Currently, developments that do not involve the division of property are not presented to the Planning Commission.

State law gives planners the power to require developers to submit a site submission and approval outside of the requirements of subdivision ordinances and regulations.

Several apartment complexes, grouped housing and / or larger subdivisions with minimum size lots are being installed. Some amenities such as sidewalks are missing from the amenities and proper repairs for fire equipment and school buses are missing.

Recently, city staff noted:

• Population densities higher than those of a standard subdivision, which can put strain on existing infrastructure such as roads, sewers and aqueduct; and,

• Several un-subdivided developments have experienced an increase in population density greater than ten percent compared to that of standard subdivided subdivisions;

As a result, these developments do not include:

• Appropriate returns and spacing;

• Open space for recreational area;

• Sidewalks;

• Utility easements;

• Fire hydrants for adequate protection against fire;

• Turnaround areas suitable for the circulation of fire trucks and school buses; and,

• Driveway to the public right-of-way.

Other items that could be included in the site plan review requirement could include:

•Car park;

• Landscaping features;

• Garbage collection areas; and,

• Impermeable area and stormwater management works required.

Last week’s action kicks off a study into what might be needed to protect the city’s citizens and infrastructure.

In the other items on the agenda, the following took place:

• APPROVED requested annexation and service plan for 8.79 acres in The Gardens Phase 8 Plat 4-A. The property will have access off the highway. 70 W. and Northside Dr. The service plan is a routine plan with planners recommending this plan and annex to City Council.

• APPROVED preliminary plan for a subdivision of 43 lots off Sparta Dr. identified as Sky View Meadow. This development will include approximately 1,500 feet of new roads and water bodies and 2,200 feet of new sewer lines. This site may require a deviation on maximum road gradients due to topography and any deviation will be included in the final plaque approval.

• APPROVED a subdivision of four lots identified as the Shaver division of the highway. 70 E. All city water and services are in place.

• APPROVED a 1,220 acre division identified as the Keener Family Division located on the highway. 70 N. outside city limits but within City Planning Area. There is an existing and functional septic tank. A waiver was granted not to require another soil test and a second waiver for the rest of the property so as not to have frontage to the road as required.

• APPROVED a proposed 1.853 acre division off a parcel identified as the Lantana Baptist Church division off Lantana Rd. The property is located outside of the city limits but within the planning area. Sewer is available for the property, but the property will continue to use the septic system in place.

• APPROVED for the minutes the Planner’s Report as follows: In house flats, Lloyd’s property, a simple subdivision along Bell Red submitted for review; regular meals in the house, The Gardens Phase 8, dish 4-A, pending fixed dish.

From July 1, 2020 to May 14, 2021, 34 planning elements were reviewed; 205 preliminary lots; 112 final lots; 91 new lots created; $ 3,450 in fees collected; 75,988 acres subdivided; and 2,780 new roads, water and sewer lines added.

Southlake City Council gives green light to site plan for Garden District residences

By Site plan

The Garden District project was first proposed to city council in 2011. (Courtesy of Cooper & Stebbins)

Southlake City Council approved a proposed site plan for 58 residences and open green spaces inside the Garden District at a meeting on May 18.

In a 6-1 vote, council gave the green light to plans for two four-story buildings along Central Avenue in Southlake Town Square. Council member Ronnell Smith was the opposite vote. The project sparked conversations about the possibility of providing high-density housing options in the city’s downtown core.

While many residents and council members expressed their opposition to the density of the project, city attorney Allen Taylor Jr. stressed that council does not have the discretion to decide whether residences should be built on this property, because the zoning was decided in 2003.

The 2.2 acres are zoned as downtown, which allows for the construction of residential developments.

“We are required to follow the requirements of the zoning ordinance to comply with Texas law,” Taylor said. “And so the board really doesn’t have the discretion at this point to reconsider this. We can fix design issues, but we’re locked into use.

xxx

The Conceptual Plan for the Garden District located at 301 and 351 Central Avenue was first presented to council in 2011, with a project of 10 buildings for a total of 140 units — 130 residences and 10 brownstones. In 2013, the concept plan was revised, reducing the number of buildings to three, for a total of 93 units — 60 residences and 33 brownstones.

The 33 approved brownstones are now almost complete.

Cooper & Stebbins developer Frank Bliss told council the 58 residential units on offer will appeal to the city’s affluent and working population with “world-class architecture.”

“[The site plan is] substantially in line with the concept plan, while at the same time allowing us to step up the quality of what we can deliver to this neighborhood, ”he said.

The site plan includes a public park, known as The Grove, and a private terrace adjacent to the existing Stebbins Park, known as The Terrace. It also includes pedestrian walkways throughout the neighborhood for accessibility.

“We’re not a developer looking for maximum density to see how much we can get down to the ground,” Bliss said. “We really want to create places, create experiences and really serve the Southlake community. “

The developer was unable to give an estimated timeline for the completion of the project, although Bliss has confirmed that the two buildings will be constructed in a single phase.

Council member Randy Robbins expressed disappointment with the current zoning of the land.

“I guess the word that would describe me tonight is just disappointment,” he said. “Disappointed that it took [the developer] 10 years to get here, and we’re grappling with the 2011 decision, and disappointed that you don’t commit – even if we approve something – to doing something in a timely manner [and] that we could be grappling with for another five or ten years without knowing what’s going on. “

According to the developer, once completed, the Garden District residences should be valued at more than $ 60 million, or $ 1 million per residence. Along with the nearly completed Brown Stones in the Garden District, the neighborhood’s total value is estimated to be over $ 100 million.

The Town Square residential program is expected to generate about $ 2.7 million in property taxes per year for Carroll ISD and more than $ 800,000 per year for the city after the residences are completed, according to documents presented by the developer to council.

“It’s one of those times when there’s a vote that might be a politically easy vote, but it’s not responsible voting. We will always do, as a council, what we need to do to protect the city’s fiscal responsibility, ”said Mayor John Huffman.

St. Louis Cardinals’ “Most Hated” MLB Team in Six States

By Site analysis

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be out of date. Please look at the history’s timestamp to see when it was last updated.

ST. LOUIS – The Cardinals-Cubs rivalry is set to renew this weekend at Busch Stadium, and analysis of an online betting site reveals some information many suspected. The Cubs are the most hated team on Twitter in Missouri, according to Betonline’s analysis of geo-tagged Twitter data.

The same research shows that the Cardinals, despite having a large regional fan base, are the most hated in six states, including the border states of Kansas, Nebraska, Illinois, Kentucky, Indiana and India. ‘Ohio.

Betonline’s analysis looked at monthly Twitter trends and found Cardinals to be “most hated” in 6 states.

The analysis was carried out over the past month and included around 90,000 tweets containing phrases such as “I hate the Cardinals” or “I hate the Yankees”. The Los Angeles Dodgers were hated in most states (9), while the Braves, Phillies, Giants and Indians were tied on being hated in one state.

Analysis found that no team was “most hated” in their home state.

Revised sitemap shows changes to proposed application Manistee Hampton Inn

By Site plan

UPDATE: A previous version of this article incorrectly quoted the author of a letter included in the Manistee Planning Commission agenda file. This story was updated to reflect the correct information as of 9:50 a.m. May 18, 2021.

MANISTEE – It’s almost time for the second round with the sitemap of a Hampton Inn development app, and there have been some changes to the app.

The planned development aims to replace the current one-story Lakeshore Motel with a five-story Hampton Inn with more than 100 rooms.

The Manistee Planning Commission voted to file the application for legal review at its April 1 meeting when commissioners wanted to ensure the application complies with Manistee’s master plan and general zoning requirements.

RELATED: Hampton Inn Application Passes City Legal Review


Now, a special meeting on the scheduled Unity Development App is scheduled for May 20.

The site plan for the planned unit development application for a Hampton Inn property near First Street Beach would have changes to aspects such as the height of certain panels, an “extended outdoor patio” and a different projected number of bedrooms. from that proposed previously.

The city defines a planned unit development as “a special land use intended to accommodate mixed or mixed-use developments, innovative design features, and/or sites with unusual topography or unique settings,” according to the ordinance. zoning. Since the hotel will include a restaurant, it is a mixed-use property.

According to 49-page Manistee Planning Commission Agenda, the previous plan called for 108 rooms, but the revised site plan calls for 101.

The package also includes a list of topics that have raised questions in previous meetings or parts of the bid process such as parking and water and sewerage.

RELATED: Petition Calls for Delay in Proposed Hampton Inn Development

A letter from Tom Welling, Vice President of Development and Facilities for Suburban Inns, to the Manistee Planning Commission was included in the agenda file and dated April 23.

The letter detailed changes to the app’s sitemap with information on how they weren’t able to add a rooftop bar, but they planned to “move the restaurant to the fifth floor at the expense of 11 rooms on this floor”.

Welling said they added two meeting rooms on the fifth floor. He said moving the restaurant, bar and kitchen opened up space on the first floor where four bedrooms could be added.

He said the monument panel would be reduced from 10 feet in height to the 8 feet currently proposed.

“We executed the pro-forma by reducing the height of the building by one floor, which would reduce the number of rooms by 33 with the restaurant and bar on the upper level,” reads the letter. “The loss of revenue from these chambers, combined with the high cost associated with land, development requirements and construction cost, reduces the return on investment to the point where it is no longer viable.”

The proposal also includes an indoor swimming pool, bocce court, volleyball, fitness center, lobby bar and parking.

“To provide additional off-site parking, the developer will pay to install 18 additional parking spaces around the site at an estimated cost of $80,000,” reads part of the agenda package’s narrative section.

The hotel is also expected to use the city’s water and sewer services that exist at the current site.

However, it is planned that stormwater will be directed to an off-site retention pond in collaboration with the city.

A point with water is that although there is water for regular use and extinguishing fires, there are not “sufficient places to connect firefighters’ apparatus”.

“To address this issue, the developer worked with the city to develop a plan to extend the water main from the dead end loop of Lakeshore Drive to the end of Harbor Drive where another loop exists. dead end water,” reads part of the story adding that it solves two dead end loop problems for the city.

In a letter dated May 3 from Manistee Department of Public Works Director Jeff Mikula to Manistee County Zoning Planner and Administrator Zachary Sompels, Mikula answered several questions posed during the development review of the planned unit.

In the letter, Mikula referred to retention ponds and the plans the Manistee Department of Public Safety had for them.

“There are several areas within the (town of Manistee) park that currently have drainage/flooding issues. This was DPW’s long term plan to address these issues with the retention pond(s). The work would have been completed when funding became available,” Mikula said. “Retention was considered because of its lower cost and lower environmental impact than a piped storm sewer that would discharge directly into the lake. If the project goes ahead, the construction cost will be paid by the developer. The retention basin will be owned and maintained by the city.

Mikula also said that the DPW did not ask for a traffic study to be carried out.

“The additional traffic created by the proposed development will not exceed the capacity of the main street network,” he explained in part.

He also said the parcel was surrounded by Manistee City Park land.

“The park is not located in an area of ​​high risk for erosion, nor in a critical dune area as classified by the Department of Energy, Great Lakes and Environment (EGLE). There are no known endangered species in the park,” he said.

The agenda file also shows that the project has five main stages: design development, design engineering, permitting, construction, and the “open for business” stage.

The design engineering phase was scheduled to run from February to September, with permits starting in September, construction in November this year until March 2023, and then the planned opening in April 2023.

The special meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. on May 20. Attendees can access the Zoom virtual meeting at us02web.zoom.us/j/88372648626?pwd=UzJjTTVYMW0zTkRFZkdTV3NhUDkxQT09. The meeting ID number is 883 7264 8626 and the access code is 600714.

The meeting can also be followed by the public by telephone by dialing +1 312 626 6799.

Hampton Inn 5.20 2021 Public Package through Arielle Breen on Scribd

Whataburger submits sitemap for Lebanon

By Site plan

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) – Lebanon Mayor Rick Bell has announced that Whataburger has officially submitted site plans to place a location in Lebanon.

According to the mayor, the Texas burger chain submitted the plans on April 21 and they will be considered at the city’s planning commission meeting on May 25. The plan submitted by Whataburger includes a 3,700 square foot building with a dual-lane drive-thru.

“I think the residents and community of Lebanon will be delighted to welcome Whataburger. People all over Texas consider it the best burger ever! People in Lebanon tell me all the time that we need more restaurant choices and I promise I am working very hard to make that happen. We have made recruiting new restaurants and economic development a priority. I’m thrilled Whataburger wants to be in Lebanon and I think if you’re considering expanding into central Tennessee, I think you should consider our city,” Mayor Bell said.

The proposed location for the business is 608 Cumberland Street, across from Lowe’s.

Consultant: Campers inquiring about the potential development of 364 sites on Perry Road in the Town of Pavilion

By Site development

Interest in a proposed campground on Perry Road in the town of Pavilion is high, according to the consultant working with a LeRoyan looking to develop 20 to 30 acres on a 94-acre plot.

“We have about 60 people who have already signed letters of intent to rent campsites,” said David Ciurzynski of Ciurzynski Consulting LLC, Attica.

Ciurzynski represented Le Roy’s Jesse Coots at the Genesee County Planning Council meeting on Thursday evening via Zoom video conference.

Planners recommended approval of a special use permit for the 346 site campground and recreation area at 10156 Perry Road, but included stipulations involving mitigation of adverse effects on wetlands. and obtaining a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

The developers are tackling these issues, Ciurzynski said.

“We are really excited about this project. We have completed the technical study and the delineation of the wetlands, which has been submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers and the DEC, ”he said. “Once we get the special use permit, we will go into full engineering and be able to complete the prevention of storm water pollution and other elements of the project.”

Ciurzynski said the plan is to start with 100 sites and expand the rest once campers start populating the campground.

Planners asked about water and sewage capacities, Ciurzynski saying the size of the project prohibits holding tanks.

“We’re going to have to do a septic system, with a full sewage bed and everything,” he said.

Planning director Felipe Oltramari responded by saying he hopes homeowners are “lucky to find water” when drilling wells.

Ciurzynski said the preferred option is to build the first 100 sites against the road to minimize the number of wells required, as the town of Pavilion has also embarked on its water district project.

“Speaking with the supervisor (Rob LaPoint), he would like this water district along Perry Road to work as well, so we hope our project will help set it up so that we can use the water from the Pavilion Water District to instead of having to drill several wells, ”he said.

Currently, the 94-acre parcel consists of woods and agricultural fields and is zoned agricultural-residential.

In other actions, planners recommended the approval of several other benchmarks, including:

  • A zone variance to change the size of the parking space for a proposed Rochester Regional Health medical building on Oak Orchard Road in the city of Batavia;
  • A special use permit for a covered outdoor dining space at the Red Osier Landmark restaurant in Stafford;
  • A zoning change to Commercial for a parcel at 211 E. Main Street to facilitate the development of the GLOW YMCA / United Memorial Medical Center Healthy Living Campus;
  • A site plan for a new liquor store at 9 E. Main St., Corfu;
  • A special use permit, with amendment, for a 5 megawatt solar system on Oak Orchard Road, south of the village of Elba;
  • A special use permit for a hair salon at 1 Farnsworth Ave., Oakfield, by appointment only.

Previously: Planners should consider an outdoor dining site at Red Osier, a major campground on Perry Road in Pavilion

Navy plans 10,000 accommodations and hotels on the NAVWAR site

By Site development

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be out of date. Please look at the history’s timestamp to see when it was last updated.

SAN DIEGO – The Navy has identified its preferred plan for the redevelopment of the NAVWAR site along Interstate 5: a massive project that would build 10,000 homes, two hotels, offices and businesses in addition to new military installations.

The 70-acre complex has been a familiar site for those who have headed to the Old Town for decades, but the Navy viewed the WWII-era hangars as an outdated and sometimes cumbersome home for the professionals of the military. cybersecurity workers working there now.

“These things were built in the 1940s to assemble B-24 bombers. So in many cases you have a building within a building, because the building itself does not lend itself well to the mission of NAVWAR, ”said Captain Kenneth Franklin, commander of Point Loma Naval Base. San Diego Union-Tribune.

The Navy has been studying alternative developments for the site for several years and officially launched a process to publicly review their options on Friday. By presenting five different plans for the reimagined site, the makers identified one of the more daring designs as their “favorite alternative”.

If their favorite vision came true, the Navy would get its new cybersecurity facilities, but would also partner with private developers to create a sprawling space that spanned 19.6 million square feet: housing 109 buildings, a transit hub and two parking structures, built in stages over a period of 30 years.

It would include 10,000 residential units, two hotels with 450 rooms between them and more than 430,000 square feet of office space in buildings up to 350 feet.

Renderings show the space would use the high-density building type and public transportation options favored by the county for future developments. The Navy stressed that the scale models do not represent the actual designs of the multi-story structures, but are intended to show their impact on sightlines around the area.

It looks like the impact would be significant.

“Visual simulations, pairing real-world photographs with modeled building heights, suggest a wall of skyscrapers along Interstate 5 that would not only block drivers’ panoramic views of Point Loma and beyond, but would dominate the old town and interfere with the Mission Hills sunsets, ”reports UT’s Jennifer Van Grove.

“The plan is estimated to block 44% of Point Loma hill views, 36% of Southwest Pacific Ocean views, and 12% of downtown skyline views. “

Less ambitious alternatives would have less impact on the surrounding area, including a plan that would redevelop the space only to the extent that it serves the Navy. Officials say they have not yet finalized on their final plans and will take public comments into account while issuing further reports.

You can view plans, subscribe to the project mailing list, and attend virtual public meetings by visiting the Navy Development website if you want to get involved.

New site plan adds townhouses off Jonesboro Road

By Site plan
Conceptual site plan for the Jonesboro Road development west of Mt Olive Road.  The site plan shows apartment buildings on the north side of the development, townhouses, and a small commercial development area proposed by South City Partners, LLC.  (Photo Studio B+C)

South City Partners, LLC of Atlanta, GA is scheduled to appear before the BOC on Tuesday, May 18. This will be their third appearance regarding the rezoning of 31.1 +/- acres off Jonesboro Road. The property is west of Mt Olive Road and McDonough Christian Church.

Update: the BOC approved the rezoning application on Monday, June 14, 2021.

The applicant is requesting a rezoning from RA (agricultural residential) and R-2 (single family residential) to MU (mixed use). Previously, District II Commissioner Dee Clemmons had asked the applicant to add townhouses. Now South City Partners has submitted an updated sitemap with the revisions.

Earlier versions of the site plan depicted 280 apartments and 10.2 +/- acres of commercial space. The commercial area included offices, shops and restaurants. Now the applicant has reduced the commercial area to 2.48 +/- acres. This change makes room for townhouses in the project.

The updated site plan maintains 280 apartments as the first concept. The revision adds 80 townhouses to the proposal. Finally, commercial space totals 25,000 square feet of office/retail.

The office/retail area and townhouses are located along the Jonesboro Road frontage. The apartments would be to the north of the property in question. Primary road access will be from Jonesboro Road at Vinings Drive. Additionally, a secondary access point will be next to Mt Olive Road.

DRI threshold

The property in question was originally part of a larger rezoning application in 2019 totaling forty-three acres. In order to avoid triggering a Regional Impact Development (RID) review, the applicant has revised its application. The twelve acres immediately adjacent to Mt Olive Road were removed from consideration.

The DRI threshold for a mixed-use development is 500,000 square feet of total space. Planning staff recommended a zoning condition to limit building area to 498,600 square feet.

The BOC may revise, add, or remove proposed zoning conditions when reviewing the application. The Board of Directors will consider the follow-up to the request on Tuesday evening. The meeting starts at 6:30 p.m.

Featured image shows a revised concept site plan for the Jonesboro Road development. Photo credit B+C Studio.

Support Henry’s Advancement

If you appreciate my work on this article, please consider supporting the site. For as little as $3 a month, you can help me keep you up to date with our community. To become a supporter, click here.

Subscribe to my E-mail. The newsletter is a great way to stay connected with Advance Henry.

Sanctuary Pointe Site Plan Amendment Sparks Debate Before Monument Trustees Grant Approval | The gallery

By Site plan

MONUMENT • Land originally zoned for a church site at Sanctuary Pointe became the subject of debate when a potential for 12 new residential lots was proposed instead.

At a May 3 hearing, the board considered an order to approve a Fourth Amendment to the Planned Sanctuary Pointe Phase 1 Development Site Plan and the First Amendment to the Development Sketch Plan.

The plan’s proposed site involved 5.11 acres north of Baptist Road and west of Fox Run Regional Park which was originally approved in 2006 to be the site of a church. However, the diocese no longer needs a church there, city planner Debbie Flynn said. Classic Development applied for the site plan amendment hoping to create 12 lots for single family homes.

The amendment would increase the density of Sanctuary Pointe development from 600 to 612 lots.

Neighborhood meetings between Classic Development and NES Inc. and current residents of Sanctuary Pointe were held in January and February. During these meetings, 15 lots were initially proposed, but the development was quickly changed to 12 after hearing residents’ concerns about lot size. According to those involved, the developer reduced the proposed number of adjacent lots to the boundary of the parcel, allowing them to look like adjacent lots.

The Landmarks Planning Commission approved the amendment in April after also hearing residents’ concerns.

Andrea Barlow of NES Inc. was on hand to further discuss aspects of the amendment, during which she noted that the increased traffic from the 12 lots would be significantly less than what would have been created by having a church on the site.

Several current residents of Sanctuary Pointe were present (and online) at the meeting to voice their objection to the ordinance. Again, some were concerned that the 12 lots would not match the size of adjacent lots. Some owners have expressed the situation as a “bait and switch” from what they were told by their sales representative when buying a house in the development.

It should be noted that this plot is offered by Classic Development, while Vantage Homes and Saddletree Homes have also sold products in adjacent lots.

One owner expressed concern that too many trees had to be felled to accommodate the lots and that the density on the lot along Baptist Road at the entrance to Sanctuary Pointe would be unsightly. Additionally, a pathway that residents use to access their mailboxes would need to be removed for the proposed lots.

Barlow said there would still be a substantial buffer of around 180 feet from Baptist Road.

Loren Moreland, vice president of classic development and project manager who also resides in Sanctuary Pointe, also spoke to the board about the concerns. He noted that many residents were not there to witness what Classic Development needed to do to get the existing lots in the development approved. Even then, he said, the developer couldn’t get everything it wanted.

“We’ve invested $70 million in infrastructure on this,” Moreland said. “It’s a huge risk. …I would say this is the highest quality community, perhaps, in Monument.

Moreland said the required grading on the parcel for eight homes would be the same for 12. Trail Residents Fear Lost was never part of the site plan, but rather created by TriView Metropolitan District, which manages services for water and sewer development, to spruce up some of its sewer line infrastructure, Moreland said.

Administrator Jim Romanello said that although the trail cannot be recovered because it was never part of the site plan, he was not comfortable voting on the ordinances after hearing the issues that surrounded him.

Trustee Laurie Clark said she sees no reason to deny approval of the ordinance because it falls within the guidelines required by the city. “I see nothing more than [Classic] can concede something other than what they already have,” she said. “At this point, our concern is whether they meet the required legal guidelines, and I am of the opinion that they do.”

Trustee Ron Stephens said while he agreed the ordinance meets the legal criteria, he would like to see any documentation from residents of Classic Development sales representatives making hints or guarantees about the future of the plot. He said Classic should not be held liable for anything Vanguard or Saddle Tree sales reps might have promised.

Moreland said members of the Classic sales team remained consistent throughout development and never made such hints. “These are not fun conversations,” he said. “It’s the part of my job that I don’t like.”

Moreland continued, “Do I think this is responsible land use? Absoutely. We did everything right – and as a landowner, what more could we do? We are not trying to blind people. We are not trying to bait and trade. These 12 grounds are 10 times more responsible than a church.

Mayor Don Wilson said while he understands the concerns expressed by community members, he believes the developer has come a long way to make adjustments to accommodate them.

“I think it’s reached a point where nobody’s going to be entirely happy,” Wilson said.

Clark moved to approve the order, which was approved 5-2. Stephens and Mayor Pro Tem Kelly Elliott voted against.

Planning board approves site plan for 13-storey Canal District development in Worcester, near Polar Park

By Site plan

WORCESTER – The Planning Council on Wednesday approved a site plan for a 13-storey mixed-use development in the Canal District.

Council and some residents had concerns about the size and scale of the proposed project, but overall members were happy with the approach to housing density and attention to detail in d other areas of design and architecture.

Gold Block Real Estate LLC seeks to demolish existing buildings – with demolition beginning earlier Wednesday – and build a 13-story, 380,580-square-foot mixed-use building, with 318 “residential units,” approximately 29,000 square feet of retail or restaurant space, and 152-space parking .

Following:40 years after Mick Jagger and the Stones, the Worcester nightclub is demolished

Retail and office space on the building’s first two floors is expected to include a candle-lit bowling alley as well as “360 degrees” of retail and dining space around the development, the director of Gold Block, Thomas Keane, to the Planning Board.

The proposed development is along Green Street. It will essentially replace the block between Plymouth and Gold streets and will overlook Polar Park.

Stephen Rolle, deputy director of city development, said the car park includes six disabled parking spaces and four electric vehicle charging stations, with capacity to expand as demand increases.

Rolle said the development will include a large locked bicycle storage room for more than 100 bikes and replicate bicycle parking spaces along the streetscape. He said the building will incorporate green roofs to absorb stormwater runoff and will feature outdoor amenities on the third and 10th floors.

Rolle said access to the parking lot would be from Gold Street and the building would be set back from the street to allow for wider sidewalks.

Rolle said the proposed building is about 163 feet tall, which is similar to other downtown buildings in that zoning district. The Bancroft on Franklin Street, he pointed out, is about 140 feet tall.

The project’s architect, Joseph Stromer, said the main objective of the project was to meet the demand for housing in the area. He said the development creates a “real opportunity for live work” and strengthens the city’s urban core. He said it is conveniently located near bus routes and a short walk to Union Station. It is pedestrian and transit-oriented, Stromer said.

The developers submitted this rendering to the city.

Stromer said the idea for the design was to visually divide the large building into three smaller buildings to give pedestrians a sense that it fit into the scale of the neighborhood.

But a few residents who called, as well as a few council members, expressed concerns about the size.

Resident Nathan Sabo said his primary concern is that the 13-story building, along with other planned developments along the Green Street corridor, will effectively isolate Polar Park from the rest of the Canal District.

“It would hardly be visible,” Sabo said.

Sabo said he also had concerns about the construction and staging and its impact on the neighborhood, and said there was no outreach to residents about the project prior to Wednesday’s meeting.

In written evidence submitted to the Planning Board, Julie Dowen of the Worcester Heritage Society strongly opposed the site plan as presented. She wrote that while the former building at Sir Morgan’s Cove was not on the state’s official register of historic buildings, its heritage and significance in Worcester’s history should not and cannot be ignored.

“The WHS urges the Worcester Planning Board and the developers of this hugely expansive project to recognize its historic value, other than taking its name, ironically, and to find a significant role in the preservation of the building and its integration into the design, notwithstanding the fact that the design as it is out of step with the character of the neighborhood and would tower over all other structures on Green Street,” Dowen wrote.

Allen Fletcher, a Canal District resident and business owner, wrote to the board that while he liked the mixed-use approach, he thought the building was too big and thought there should be enough of parking spaces included to cover all units.

Council members said they understood the public’s concerns about the size and scale of the project, but council chairman Albert LaValley noted that in the zoning district where the proposed project is located, nothing limits the size or height of the building.

Members expressed satisfaction with the green roofs, bicycle parking and electric vehicle charging stations. Board member Ellie Gilmore said she was actually pleased to see a less than one-to-one ratio of parking spaces to people. She said she actually would have liked to see less vehicle parking.

“If we’re trying to create a dense, walkable neighborhood, having personal vehicles hurts that,” Gilmore said.

Gilmore said she was disappointed to hear residents report a lack of public engagement.

Board member Edward Moynihan made a commitment to the developers that the renders would not change significantly throughout the life of the project. Board member Paul DePalo said he thinks the scale of the project is big and should be the way the city should think about creating density in neighborhoods like the Canal District. He said he recognizes that any project can have negative consequences, but he thinks this proposal would be great for the city.

Four of the properties that are part of the new plan that was presented to the Planning Board on Wednesday were part of a deal that allowed the city to offload properties it had taken through eminent domain as part of the construction project from Polar Park. The properties at 85 Green St., 2 Plymouth St., 5 Gold St., and 7 Gold St. were ultimately not needed as part of the ballpark. The city, through the Worcester Redevelopment Authority, reached an agreement to sell the properties to Churchill James for $3 million – the amount the city paid.

According to the Secretary of State’s Corporate Database, Gold Block is managed by Harry DiLeo, Keane and Christopher Archambault. Keane and DiLeo also manage Churchill James.

The proceeds were allocated to an initial reserve fund to repay stadium project obligations.

Due to its proximity to the ballpark, the new project, if approved and constructed, will be included in the District Improvement Funding Area created to fund construction of the ballpark. The additional increase in tax revenue generated from private development in the neighborhood will be used to cover debt service on the bonds sold to fund construction of the 10,000-seat ballpark.

• The Planning Board also approved its first special permit for an independent adult marijuana testing lab on Wednesday.

The council on Wednesday approved the special permit for the facility at 41 Fremont St. and approved a parking plan across the street at 32 Delaware St. for Legacy Foundation Group. No marijuana will be sold or grown on site; it will serve as a test facility for other retailers to ensure quality control, Legacy’s Tye Thaden told the board.

Site plan approved for climbing gym at Ashwaubenon

By Site plan

By Kevin Boneske
Personal editor


ASHWAUBENON — A site plan to include a climbing gym as part of a planned five-story building along Mike McCarthy Way was approved Tuesday, April 27, by village council.

Community Development Manager Aaron Schuette said Merge Urban Development previously received approval from the village council in January to build a mixed-use structure on the north side of Mike McCarthy Way between Holmgren Way and South Ashland Avenue.

Schuette said the climbing gym addition will be attached to the east of the building and operated by Odyssey Climbing Company, which will have indoor climbing walls and a bouldering gym as amenity for the building’s residents as well as the public.

“On the north side of the building there will be the main entrance (for the climbing hall) as well as a glass curtain wall,” he said. “To break up the mass (of the gymnasium wall) along Mike McCarthy Way, six Princeton Sentry Ginkgo biloba trees will be planted.”

Schuette said two small climbing hills will be added to the public patio in front of the building to help market the property.

He said the site plan review committee and the village plan commission had previously recommended the site plan for approval.

Ben Ganther of Odyssey Climbing told the commission on April 8 that his company would sell memberships for the climbing gym.

“There are also daytime uses,” he said. “People can come in and climb for the day or a few hours. We have a small equipment store that is also part of it. It is a separate commercial entity from the overall development, but it obviously serves as an attraction and amenity for the residents of the building as well.

Ganther said Odyssey Climbing, which will occupy just under 12,000 square feet in the building, expects to attract about 1,700 members for the climbing gym.

“It will take us a few years to reach this level,” he said. “Now it won’t be the number of people in there at one time, but it’s probably designed to hold around 250 people at (maximum) capacity, more or less.”

Because the property is located in the from the village A sports and entertainment zoning district, the site plan required final approval from the village council.

Merge plans to construct the five-story mixed-use building with 3,100 square feet of retail space on the first floor, 88 multi-family residential units on the second through fifth floors, and the climbing gym on the east side of the building.

Schuette said the building with the climbing gym is the first phase of Merge’s development, which could include additional structures in the area.